Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

10:24
Regenerative Therapy by Suprachoroidal Cell Autograft in Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration: Preliminary In Vivo Report
Published on: February 12, 2018
US Retina Specialists' Preferences for Geographic Atrophy Treatment.
Karl Csaky1, Anthony M Pepio2, Caitlin Thomas3
1Ophthalmology Department, Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX, USA.
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
|June 15, 2026
Summary
Retina specialists prioritize slowing geographic atrophy (GA) lesion growth over treatment risks and injection frequency. They are more willing to accept risks for treatments with greater efficacy, especially for patients with foveal-threatening lesions.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Diseases
- Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Background:
- Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
- Current treatments for GA focus on complement inhibition, with others in development.
- Understanding retina specialists' (RS) treatment preferences is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively assess retina specialists' preferences for geographic atrophy (GA) treatments.
- To explore how GA treatment characteristics influence RS preferences and trade-offs.
- To determine if these preferences vary based on patient profiles.
Main Methods:
- A best-best discrete choice experiment (BB-DCE) involving 166 US-based retina specialists.
- Participants evaluated hypothetical treatment options based on lesion growth reduction, risks (uveitis, wet AMD progression, vasculitis), and injection frequency.
- Patient profiles were defined by GA lesion location and visual acuity.
Main Results:
- Lesion growth rate reduction was the most significant factor (47%) in RS decision-making.
- Reducing the risk of progression to wet AMD (15% to 1%) had the largest impact among risks (~20%).
- Retina specialists preferred one-time treatments over monthly injections and showed increased risk tolerance for patients with foveal-threatening GA.
Conclusions:
- Retina specialists prioritize efficacy (lesion growth reduction) over treatment risks and injection frequency for GA.
- Risk tolerance is higher for treatments with greater efficacy and for patients with foveal-threatening GA lesions.
- A one-time treatment option may be preferred over monthly injections if efficacy is comparable, even with slightly higher risks.
