Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Inaugural year of preference signaling in im subspecialty fellowships: multi-institutional survey about program
Radhika Narla1,2, Robin Stiller3, Laura A Huppert4
1Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Background:
Preference signalling was introduced into internal medicine subspecialty fellowship recruitment in the 2025-2026 cycle, adding a new consideration for applicants, mentors, and fellowship programs. We sought to characterize program director (PD) perceptions of signalling during this inaugural cycle and identify implications for advising.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional anonymous survey of PDs in five internal medicine subspecialties at three West Coast academic institutions (University of Washington, Oregon Health & Science University, and University of California, San Francisco) from December 2025 to January 2026. Quantitative responses were summarized descriptively, and free-text responses were analyzed using inductive content analysis.
Results:
Eleven of 15 PDs responded (73%). Ten of 11 respondents (91%) agreed that signalling helped identify applicants with genuine interest, and 10 of 11 (91%) agreed that it streamlined interview selection. However, signalling was not perceived to reduce overall review burden. Common challenges included interpreting a 'no signal' (7/11, 64%), uncertainty about how much weight to assign signals (5/11, 45%), ambiguity regarding whether home-institution applicants should signal, and inconsistent interpretation of tiered signals across programs. PDs emphasized the importance of transparency and consistency in signalling practices.
Conclusions:
In this early multi-institutional experience, preference signalling was valued as a practical screen-in tool, but its interpretation remained variable across programs. For educators, the main challenge is not deciding whether signalling matters but helping applicants navigate how it is used in different subspecialty contexts. More consistent communication about non-signals, home-institution expectations, and tiered signals may improve advising, transparency, and trust in the fellowship recruitment process.
Related Concept Videos
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
Correspondence Bias
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Relationship Formation
