Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Benchmark Survey on Content Development and Key Performance Indicators: A phactMI Benchmarking Survey Update
Robert Tamburri1,2, Mary K Sendi1,3, Anja Glaetzer1,4
1phactMI, 5931 NW 1st Place, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA.
Objective:
Medical Information plays a critical role in delivering accurate, evidence-based responses to unsolicited requests. At the heart of the response is the content developed by Medical Information. Additionally, the metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) surrounding content development and delivery are necessary to gauge the utilization and impact of the content. Because the landscape has evolved significantly since the last survey in 2018, the need to re-examine content development approaches and KPIs is warranted. The objective of this benchmarking survey was to assess the evolving approach and tactics of content development and utilization of KPIs of phactMI member companies with a comparison to 2018 where applicable.
Methods:
In May 2024, an electronic survey containing 71 closed and open-ended questions was distributed to 36 phactMI member companies. The survey included demographics, development of specific content, scientific response documents (SRDs), custom response documents, and metrics and KPI. Results were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
Results:
Medical Information teams primarily develop content for HCPs (90%) versus patients (10%). Disease state content creation was more common among small/midsize companies (36%) than large companies (18%), though requests for such content were infrequent. Similar to 2018, SRDs remain predominantly traditional written documents (66%), with emerging use of frequently asked questions, infographics, HTML, and slide decks. Most companies (85%) maintain centralized SRD development, but the proportion without target timelines for SRD development increased from 37% in 2018 to 72% in 2024. AI adoption is in early stages, with 3 companies actively using it and 18 exploring applications, primarily for writing and paraphrasing. Omnichannel integration is reported by 59% of companies, and custom response documents account for 25% of inquiries. Similar to 2018, the most common KPIs in medical information departments include inquiry volume, turnaround time, and document updates. There is a growing emphasis on customer satisfaction and digital engagement. HCPs most frequently use email (52%) and phone (29%) for information, while digital channels remain underutilized.
Conclusion:
This benchmarking survey highlights the need for ongoing innovation, strategic alignment, and robust quality assurance in Medical Information content development and KPI reporting. While many things are similar to 2018, customer expectations continue to evolve and technology has advanced. Organizations must balance operational efficiency with personalized engagement, while ensuring compliance and ethical standards. For the future, the three areas to prioritize are establishing non-traditional content development formats, processes, and workflows; expanding digital and mobile optimization; and strengthening governance around AI and content reuse.
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Data Collection by Survey
Quality Assurance
Indicators
Surveys
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...