Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

11:41
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
Published on: February 1, 2020
Can surrogate safety measures explain crash patterns at signalized intersections? evidence from network-wide
Mehrdad Nasri1, Jingyi He1, Muhammad Monjurul Karim1
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Journal of Safety Research
|June 15, 2026
Summary
Critical deceleration rate to avoid a crash (DRAC) effectively predicts crash risk from connected vehicle data. This framework highlights DRAC as a reliable indicator for proactive, network-wide safety management.
Area of Science:
- Transportation Engineering
- Traffic Safety
- Data Science
Background:
- Connected vehicle (CV) data offers potential for proactive, network-wide safety management.
- Existing guidance on transforming CV trajectory data into actionable safety indicators is limited.
- This study introduces a framework to extract surrogate safety measures (SSMs) from CV data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a reproducible framework for extracting SSMs from CV trajectory data.
- To quantify the relationships between extracted SSMs and police-reported crashes.
- To assess the influence of modeling techniques on predicting crash outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Extracted three SSMs: critical deceleration rate to avoid a crash (DRAC), time-to-collision (TTC), and post-encroachment time (PET) from 54.8 million trajectory points.
- Mapped SSM counts to 139 signalized intersections in Tucson, Arizona, and linked them to five years of crash data.
- Employed Negative Binomial regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and a diffusion graph neural network to model crash-SSM relationships.
Main Results:
- DRAC emerged as the most influential predictor across all model families, significantly associated with rear-end, left-turn, and angle crashes.
- An increase of one thousand DRAC events correlated with a 5-10% rise in expected crashes of these types.
- XGBoost models with DRAC achieved a coefficient of determination above 0.60 for rear-end and no-injury crashes; TTC showed smaller effects, PET was negligible.
Conclusions:
- DRAC is a reliable network-wide screening tool for identifying crash risk.
- TTC provides supplemental insights for specific crash types (turning, low-injury), while PET offers limited value at a 1-second sampling rate.
- The framework demonstrates the utility of large-scale CV data and modern modeling for data-driven crash prevention.