Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Establishment and Evaluation of a Sheep Model of Full-thickness Osteochondral Defect
Published on: April 14, 2026
Natural Biomaterials for Osteochondral Repair: From Source to Strategy
Hengyu Liu1, Hanyang Zhang1, Wenbo Yang1,2
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, P. R. China.
None:
Osteochondral tissue repair remains a formidable clinical challenge due to its complex layered structure and limited intrinsic healing capacity. Compared with synthetic materials, natural biomaterials offer distinct advantages, including excellent biocompatibility, intrinsic bioactivity, and structural similarity to native tissues, making them particularly well-suited for recreating the native tissue microenvironment and guiding cellular behavior. This review systematically examines natural biomaterials used in osteochondral repair according to their biological origin, covering human-derived, animal-derived, plant-derived, and microbial-derived categories, and discusses how the source-specific biological properties of each category underpin their respective repair mechanisms and applications. Within animal-derived materials, particular attention is given to decellularization strategies, as the choice of method critically determines the preservation of bioactive components and the immunogenic profile of the resulting scaffold. Notably, 91.5% of the 47 osteochondral repair products approved globally since 2000 incorporate natural materials, further underscoring their enduring clinical relevance. We further highlight that the absence of standardized preparation, quality control, and evaluation frameworks remains an important challenge for broader clinical adoption. Establishing reproducible and verifiable standards will be essential to bridging the gap between laboratory innovation and clinical translation.

