Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Rethinking ytterbium(III)-based single-molecule magnets - why trigonal planar doesn't work
Vinicius K Fagundes1, Egidio Dias Viegas1, Marcus J Giansiracusa1
1School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. marcus.giansiracusa@unimelb.edu.au.
Abstract:
Yb(III)-based single-molecule magnets (SMMs) have remained conspicuously absent under zero-field conditions, appearing only with applied dc fields or under diamagnetic dilution. Utilising both CASSCF and CASPT2 methodologies, we systematically investigate the crystal field splitting of Yb(III) in a series of symmetry-constrained model complexes to elucidate the electronic origins of this limitation. By analysing equatorial ligand field environments that promote maximal axial anisotropy and benchmarking against the behaviour of Er(III), we identify fundamental differences in their electronic structures that disfavour slow magnetic relaxation in Yb(III). Quantitative estimates of the quantum tunnelling of magnetisation (QTM) rates reveal that substantial transverse g-tensor components are intrinsic to Yb(III) in most high-symmetry coordination environments, leading to rapid zero-field relaxation. Notably, even ideal D3h, D4h, and D6h symmetries fail to sufficiently suppress transverse anisotropy. Only D5h and D4d symmetries lead to the plausible prediction of SMM behaviour owing to the formal quenching of wavefunction mixing and thus QTM. Comparatively, Er(III) complexes systematically show higher g-tensor axiality, rationalising their superior zero-field performance. Using ideal crystal field parameterisation within a model Hamiltonian framework, we establish stringent symmetry criteria specifically for Yb(III) thereby guiding future synthetic efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I

