Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Rethinking ytterbium(III)-based single-molecule magnets - why trigonal planar doesn't work
Vinicius K Fagundes1, Egidio Dias Viegas1, Marcus J Giansiracusa1
1School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. marcus.giansiracusa@unimelb.edu.au.
Zero-field single-molecule magnets (SMMs) are rare for Ytterbium(III) due to inherent electronic structures. Specific symmetries like D5h and D4d are crucial for achieving slow magnetic relaxation in Yb(III) SMMs.
Area of Science:
- Quantum Chemistry
- Materials Science
- Magnetism
Background:
- Ytterbium(III)-based single-molecule magnets (SMMs) typically require applied fields or dilution for magnetic properties.
- Understanding the electronic origins of limited zero-field SMM behavior in Yb(III) is crucial for designing new materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the crystal field splitting of Yb(III) in model complexes.
- To elucidate the electronic factors limiting zero-field SMM behavior in Yb(III).
- To identify symmetry criteria for achieving slow magnetic relaxation in Yb(III) SMMs.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field (CASSCF) and CASPT2 methodologies.
- Analyzed symmetry-constrained model complexes with varying equatorial ligand field environments.
- Benchmarked Yb(III) behavior against Erbium(III) complexes.
- Estimated quantum tunnelling of magnetisation (QTM) rates.
Main Results:
- Substantial transverse g-tensor components in Yb(III) lead to rapid zero-field relaxation across most high-symmetry environments.
- Ideal symmetries (D3h, D4h, D6h) do not sufficiently suppress transverse anisotropy for Yb(III) SMMs.
- Only D5h and D4d symmetries show potential for SMM behavior by quenching QTM.
- Erbium(III) complexes exhibit higher g-tensor axiality, explaining their superior zero-field performance.
Conclusions:
- Fundamental electronic differences between Yb(III) and Er(III) explain the lack of zero-field Yb(III) SMMs.
- Stringent symmetry criteria (specifically D5h and D4d) are necessary for designing Yb(III) based zero-field SMMs.
- Findings provide guidance for future synthetic efforts targeting Yb(III) SMMs.
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I

