Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Correction of Presbyopia by Monocular Bi-Aspheric Ablation Profile
Published on: September 20, 2024
Clinical outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the light adjustable lens: results of a phase IV clinical
Julie M Schallhorn1, Alekya Rajanala
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California (Schallhorn, Rajanala); F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California (Schallhorn, Rajanala); Veteran's Administration Medical Center, San Francisco, California (Schallhorn).
Purpose:
To report the outcomes of the light adjustable lens (LAL) collected from a clinical registry.
Setting:
Multiple private practices in the United States.
Design:
Multicenter prospective observational study.
Methods:
Patients who underwent bilateral LAL implantation and who had corrected distance visual acuity ≥20/20 -2 before lens adjustment were enrolled. Assessment was performed at one visit 1 to 3 months after final lock-in treatment.
Results:
A total of 1101 participants (2202 eyes) were included. Of these, 586 eyes had prior corneal refractive surgery (CRS) and 1616 had no prior CRS (No CRS). 12.3% of participants were targeted for bilateral emmetropia, 9.3% for bilateral near, and 78.4% for blended vision. Of eyes targeted for emmetropia, 81.2% achieved a uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of ≥20/20 (82.2% of No CRS and 78.4% of CRS). A total of 94.3% of eyes targeted for emmetropia had a manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) of ≤0.5 diopter (D) (94.7% of No CRS, 92.8% of CRS). The mean prediction error in MSE was -0.048 ± 0.366 D in No CRS and -0.016 ± 0.441 D in CRS. A total of 89% of patients with blended vision and 93% of patients with bilateral emmetropic target had binocular UDVA of ≥20/20. In the CRS group, 87% with blended vision and 87% with binocular emmetropia achieved binocular UDVA of ≥20/20. Binocular uncorrected near visual acuity of ≥J1 was achieved with blended vision in 85% of patients in the No CRS group and 82% of patients in the CRS group.
Conclusions:
In this multicenter study, patients achieved a high degree of precision with the LAL regardless of prior CRS.
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Glaucoma: Overview