Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

10:58
Facilitating the Analysis of Immunological Data with Visual Analytic Techniques
Published on: January 2, 2011
Evaluating interactive 2D visualization as a sample selection strategy for biomedical time-series data annotation
Einari Vaaras1, Manu Airaksinen2, Okko Räsänen1
1Signal Processing Research Centre, Tampere University, Tampere, 33720, Finland.
Computers in Biology and Medicine
|June 16, 2026
Summary
Comparing annotation methods for biomedical time-series data, 2D visualizations (2DV) generally improved label aggregation. However, random sampling (RND) offered the safest approach with uncertain annotator expertise or count.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Informatics
- Machine Learning
- Data Science
Background:
- Accurate data labeling is crucial for reliable machine learning in biomedical applications.
- Annotating complex biomedical time-series data presents significant challenges.
- Algorithmic sample selection methods can aid annotation but require validation with human annotators.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of three algorithmic sample selection methods for annotating biomedical time-series data.
- To evaluate random sampling (RND), farthest-first traversal (FAFT), and a 2D visualization (2DV) based method.
- To assess performance across infant motility assessment (IMA) and speech emotion recognition (SER) tasks with varying annotator expertise.
Main Methods:
- Three sample selection methods (RND, FAFT, 2DV) were compared across four classification tasks.
- Twelve human annotators (experts and non-experts) performed data annotation under a limited budget.
- Post-annotation experiments evaluated method performance and annotator experience.
Main Results:
- The 2DV method generally yielded the best aggregated labels across all tasks.
- In infant motility assessment, 2DV captured rare classes but showed high label variability, favoring FAFT for individual annotator models.
- For speech emotion recognition, 2DV excelled with expert annotators and matched expert performance with non-experts.
- Random sampling (RND) presented the lowest risk when annotator count or expertise was uncertain.
Conclusions:
- 2D visualization-based sampling is a promising approach for biomedical time-series data annotation, especially with adequate annotation budgets.
- The choice of method depends on task specifics, annotator characteristics, and budget constraints.
- The 2DV method enhanced annotator engagement, making the task more interesting and enjoyable.
