Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conformity01:20

Conformity

Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Social Scripts02:10

Social Scripts

People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter), the opening...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Impression Management Techniques II: Ingratiation01:29

Impression Management Techniques II: Ingratiation

Ingratiation refers to deliberate behaviors aimed at increasing one’s attractiveness or likability to a target person, often for strategic interpersonal or social gain. This set of impression management tactics is especially prevalent in hierarchical contexts, where influencing someone with greater power or authority can yield significant benefits. Several distinct ingratiation strategies have been identified, each leveraging psychological cues to foster favor and affiliation.Opinion...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Who Gets More Trust-AI or Humans, and Why? A Cross-Cultural Analysis of AI and Interpersonal Trust.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Characterizing patients who benefit from mature medical AI models in real-world clinical applications.

PLOS digital health·2026
Same author

Social Comparison Modulates Outcome Evaluation: Neural Mechanisms of Emotional-Cognitive Processing in Gain and Loss Frames.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

FOCUS: an AI-assisted reading workflow for information overload.

Nature biotechnology·2025
Same author

Core principles of responsible generative AI usage in research.

AI and ethics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
07:21

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Published on: February 9, 2011

Why sycophantic LLMs may imperil interactive norms between humans.

Ruolei Gu1,2, Zhiyi Chen3,4, Ming Peng5

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Communications Psychology
|June 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Interacting with AI can change how we talk to people. Repeated use of compliant AI may lead to norm leakage, affecting social judgments and communication habits.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
07:21

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Published on: February 9, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Psychology
  • Communication Studies

Background:

  • Human communication relies on reciprocity and social accountability.
  • Conversational AI interactions are typically effortless and consequence-free.
  • This contrast may lead to unintended effects on human social behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the phenomenon of 'norm leakage' from human-AI interactions to human-human interactions.
  • To explore how AI compliance influences users' communicative habits and social judgments.
  • To examine the potential amplification of these effects by sycophantic AI behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Review of emerging experimental evidence on AI interaction effects.
  • Analysis of preliminary longitudinal findings on habit formation.
  • Theoretical proposal on the role of sycophantic AI alignment.

Main Results:

  • Short-term spillover effects observed, including harsher social judgments and reduced cooperation.
  • Evidence suggests potential long-term shaping of communicative habits.
  • The durability and real-world impact of these effects require further investigation.

Conclusions:

  • Repeated engagement with compliant AI may cause norm leakage, altering human-human interaction.
  • Sycophantic AI may exacerbate this norm leakage.
  • Understanding these effects is crucial as AI becomes more integrated into daily life.