Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Protocol for a SPIRIT extension for reporting pragmatic and explanatory trial protocols designed using the PRECIS
Jeremy Y Ng1, Merrick Zwarenstein2, Azadeh Barzideh3
1Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Robert Bosch Center for Integrative Medicine and Health, Bosch Health Campus, Stuttgart, Germany; Centre for Journalology, Methodological and Implementation Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Research, Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Health, School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Background And Objective:
The need to design randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with explicit intent, either pragmatic or explanatory, and matching design features is well recognized. There is a need for clear, standardized reporting recommendations for protocols for these RCTs to facilitate communication of trialists' intention and trial design choices. This protocol outlines the development process of a Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials extension applicable to RCTs where authors explicitly declare their intention for the trial. This will enhance the transparency, reproducibility, and comprehensiveness of RCT protocol reports.
Methods:
Using the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research Network's structured multiphase approach, the study begins with a scoping review to identify existing literature and reporting guidelines for pragmatic and explanatory RCTs designed using the PRECIS tool (PRECIS RCTs), which will inform a draft checklist. An international panel including trialists, trial methodologists, clinicians and policy decision-makers, biostatisticians, regulatory representatives, research funders, journal editors, and patient partners will then participate in a Delphi process to achieve consensus on essential checklist items. This will involve at least two rounds of structured surveys. A consensus meeting with approximately 30 experts will meet to finalize the checklist items, incorporating findings from both the scoping review and the Delphi process. The authors will draft the final SPIRIT-PRECIS checklist and accompanying explanation documents. The checklist will be pilot tested with end users to ensure their clarity and practical utility. The final checklist will be refined based on feedback from pilot testing and disseminated through publications, workshops, and online training opportunities.
Results:
The study will produce a consensus-based SPIRIT-PRECIS checklist and accompanying explanation documents for reporting protocols of RCTs in which authors explicitly declare their trial intention.
Conclusion:
The SPIRIT-PRECIS checklist is expected to enhance the transparency, reproducibility, and comprehensiveness of RCT protocol reports by providing standardized reporting recommendations for protocols of pragmatic and explanatory RCTs.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Ethics in Research
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Data Reporting and Recording

