Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Immune checkpoint inhibitors with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in proficient MMR rectal cancer: systematic review
Reza Ghalehtaki1,2, Romina Abyaneh3, Mohammad-Mahdi Aghaei2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background:
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (CRT-ICI) for mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
Methods:
Five databases were systematically searched. Pooled pathological complete response (pCR) and composite clinical response (CR) and grade 3-4 neoadjuvant-related adverse events (AEs), surgical AEs, and immune-related AEs (ir-AEs) were calculated, and comparative results (CRT-ICI vs. CRT alone) were conducted on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) via risk ratios (RRs). Also, subgroup analyses were conducted in pMMR-exclusive cohorts for all available endpoints.
Results:
Eighteen studies (1,619 patients) were included. The pooled pCR rate was 41% (95% CI: 36-47%) overall and in the pMMR-exclusive group (95% CI: 35-48%). Composite CR rates were 49% (95%CI: 38-60%) overall and 54% (95%CI: 41-66%) in pMMR cohorts. Analysis of comparative RCTs showed CRT-ICI significantly improved both pCR (RR 1.7, 95%CI:1.38-2.09) and CR rates (RR 1.76, 95%CI:1.43-2.17) compared to CRT alone. The pMMR-exclusive group confirmed a significant CR (RR 1.76, 95%CI:1.3-2.37, p < 0.01) and pCR (RR 1.66, 95%CI:1.15-2.4; p < 0.01) benefit. Grade 3-4 neoadjuvant-related AEs occurred in 23% of patients, with a significant increase over CRT alone (RR 1.26, 95%CI:1.01-1.57). Surgical complications (6% overall; 4% in the pMMR-exclusive group) and ir-AEs (4% overall; 3% in the pMMR-exclusive group) were infrequent. A subgroup analysis of RCTs showed that short-course ICI containing regimen (SCRT + ICI) significantly improved pCR (RR 1.90, 95%CI: 1.36-2.65) and CR (RR 1.84, 95%CI: 1.37-2.47) over SCRT alone. However, long-course regimen (LCRT + ICI) did not show a benefit over LCRT alone (pCR: RR 1.31, 95%CI 0.94-1.81, CR: RR 1.17, 95%CI 0.53-2.59). Additionally, SCRT + ICI led to higher pooled pCR/CR rates than LCRT + ICI (CR: 59% vs. 36%, p = 0.031; pCR: 51% vs. 33%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusion:
In pMMR LARC, our results suggested that neoadjuvant CRT-ICI was associated with higher pCR/CR rates than CRT alone based on the analysis of available trials. This effect, however, appears confined to SCRT-ICI, with no corresponding gain seen in LCRT-ICI. Although treatment‑related toxicity is increased, severe immune‑related and surgical adverse events are infrequent. These findings suggest that selective use of CRT‑ICI may be considered, particularly when downstaging or organ preservation is a goal, but confirmatory trials and continued longitudinal follow‑up are warranted to assess response durability, survival benefits, and late toxicity.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:29Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019