Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Labelling, Defining and Classifying the Active Ingredients in Oral Language Interventions for Children With or at
Pauline Frizelle1, Doris Murphy1, Lenora Murphy1
1University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
This review found significant inconsistencies in how child language intervention active ingredients are described, hindering replication and evidence-based practice. Developing consensus on labeling and a unified taxonomy is crucial for effective (Developmental) Language Disorder ((D)LD) interventions.
Area of Science:
- Speech and Language Therapy
- Child Language Acquisition
- Clinical Intervention Research
Background:
- Effective child language interventions for (Developmental) Language Disorder ((D)LD) are increasingly studied.
- Under-specified reporting of intervention active ingredients impedes translation of evidence into practice.
- This systematic review addresses inconsistencies in defining and labelling therapy components.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify, summarize, and synthesize the labeling, definition, description, and classification of active ingredients in oral language interventions for children with or at risk for (D)LD.
- To analyze how these components are presented in empirical and clinical literature.
Main Methods:
- A registered systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID CRD42024541407).
- Searches across seven electronic databases for peer-reviewed studies (2019-2024), intervention taxonomies, manuals (last 10 years), and relevant textbooks.
- Data extraction guided by the TIDieR checklist and additional relevant items.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 243 articles revealed significant reporting inconsistencies in active ingredients.
- Identical labels masked different mechanisms, similar mechanisms had different labels, and terms were used ambiguously.
- These inconsistencies impede intervention replication and cross-study comparisons.
Conclusions:
- A need exists for consensus on consistent, precise, and non-overlapping labeling and definitions of intervention active ingredients.
- Development of a comprehensive, integrative taxonomy is essential for clarity and usability in reporting oral language interventions for (D)LD.
- Clear definitions and a unified framework are critical for clinicians to implement evidence-based practices effectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology ll
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Language and Cognition
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Components of Language

