Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
Published on: May 31, 2021
Clinical and immunological markers of peanut allergy severity and tolerance in children
Tadej Petek1, Brigita Koren1, Maja Tomazin1
1Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Insights
Biomarkers like peanut skin prick tests (SPT), specific IgE (sIgE), and basophil activation tests (BAT) can help predict severe peanut allergy reactions and tolerance. These tools may reduce the need for oral food challenges (OFCs).
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Peanut Allergy Research
Background:
- Improved diagnostic tools are crucial for assessing severe peanut allergy (PA) risk and predicting its resolution.
- Current diagnostic methods for PA may require enhancement to accurately stratify patient risk and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of various biomarkers in distinguishing between mild and severe peanut allergic reactions.
- To identify biomarkers that can predict clinical tolerance to peanuts, potentially reducing the need for oral food challenges (OFCs).
- To assess the utility of basophil activation testing (BAT) and component-resolved diagnostics in managing peanut allergy.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter study (2020-2024) involving children (3 months-18 years) with confirmed peanut allergy (PA).
- Diagnosis confirmed via clinical history, skin prick tests (SPT), peanut specific IgE (sIgE), and/or oral food challenges (OFC).
- Comparison of children with mild (World Allergy Organization-WAO grade 1) versus severe (WAO grade ≥2) reactions; BAT and component-resolved diagnostics performed on all participants.
Main Results:
- Children experiencing anaphylaxis had significantly larger SPT wheals and higher peanut sIgE levels compared to those with milder reactions.
- Anaphylaxis was associated with greater sensitization to specific peanut allergens (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 6) and higher BAT responses.
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses indicated moderate discrimination (AUC 0.75-0.8) for SPT, sIgE, specific Ara h components, and BAT.
- Clinical tolerance to peanuts was associated with lower sIgE, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 levels, and a trend towards lower BAT responses.
Conclusions:
- Peanut SPT, sIgE, Ara h sensitization, and BAT demonstrate moderate ability to differentiate between severe and mild allergic reactions.
- Peanut sIgE, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 levels are associated with clinical tolerance, suggesting their potential role in predicting resolution.
- These biomarkers may help optimize diagnostic strategies, potentially reducing the necessity for OFCs in select peanut-allergic children.
Background:
Improved diagnostic tools are needed to assess the risk of severe peanut allergy (PA) and/or predict its resolution.
Methods:
This prospective multicenter cross-sectional study with follow-up elements (2020-2024) included children aged 3 months-18 years with confirmed PA. Diagnosis relied on clinical history, skin-prick test wheals (SPT), peanut sIgE, and/or oral food challenge (OFC). Children with isolated systemic cutaneous reactions (World Allergy Organization-WAO grade 1) were compared with children with WAO grade ≥2 reactions. Basophil activation testing (BAT) and component-resolved diagnostics were performed in all participants, and OFC assessed tolerance in selected children.
Results:
Among 51 children (24 WAO grade 1 and 27 grade 2-5), those with anaphylaxis had larger SPT wheals (p = 0.037) and peanut sIgE levels (p = 0.036). Children with anaphylaxis had greater sensitization to Ara h 1 (p = 0.021), Ara h 2 (p = 0.041), and Ara h 6 (p = 0.030) and higher BAT responses after adjustment for age, total IgE, and the number of food allergens to which they were allergic. Overall, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed area under the curve values ranging from 0.75 to 0.8 for Ara h 1, peanut sIgE, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, and Ara h 6 and SPT and BAT at greatest concentrations. OFC was performed in 20 children (6 with anaphylaxis). Tolerance was associated with lower sIgE (p = 0.033), Ara h 2 (p = 0.032) and Ara h 6 (p = 0.020), and BAT showed a possible association (p = 0.060) after adjustment for relevant confounders.
Conclusion:
Several biomarkers, including peanut SPT, sIgE, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 6, and BAT showed moderate discrimination between systemic cutaneous reactions and anaphylaxis, while peanut sIgE, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 were associated with clinical tolerance. Evaluating these biomarkers may help reduce the need for OFCs in selected cases.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis
Allergic Reactions
Asthma III: Clinical Manifestations
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...

