Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introduction to Progress and Puzzles of Cognitive Science: Introduction to a Wiley Virtual Issue.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Human verifications: Computable with truth values outside logic.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Cognitive processes in imaginative moral shifts: How judgments of morally unacceptable actions change.

Memory & cognition·2022
Same author

How people keep track of what is real and what is imagined: The epistemic status of counterfactual alternatives to reality.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2020
Same author

If and or: Real and counterfactual possibilities in their truth and probability.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2019
Same journal

Limits to Language Prediction: Findings From Diverse Populations.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

There Is More Than Meets the Eye: The Dual Role of Perception in Shaping Color Lexicons.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Gesture Use Across Different Concepts: Focusing on Cross-Linguistic Diversity.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Exploring Amazonian Cognitive Diversity at Chana Research Station.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Do (We Think That) Plants Have Agency?

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

How Well Can Words Capture Facial Appearance? A Cross-Linguistic Exploration.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Inference and Imagination.

Ruth M J Byrne1

  • 1Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland.

Topics in Cognitive Science
|June 19, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Imagination is key to reasoning and decision-making. Our capacity to envision alternatives to reality enables deductive inferences and moral judgments, highlighting imagination

Keywords:
CounterfactualsImaginationInferenceMoral decisionsReasoningSuppression

More Related Videos

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Human cognition relies heavily on the ability to imagine alternatives to reality.
  • Reasoning and inference depend on simulating possibilities beyond current facts.
  • Understanding these processes is crucial for explaining complex cognitive functions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the role of imagination in deductive inference.
  • To examine how the ability to create alternatives to reality influences decision-making.
  • To investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying imaginative simulation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of evidence on inference suppression and counterfactual reasoning.
  • Analysis of cognitive processes based on mental models and simulation availability.
  • Examination of studies on moral decision-making and control over simulated situations.

Main Results:

  • Deductive inference skills are significantly linked to the capacity for imagining possibilities.
  • The ability to generate alternatives to reality depends on identifying mutable aspects of mental simulations.
  • Evidence from counterfactual and moral reasoning studies supports these cognitive models.

Conclusions:

  • Imagination is fundamental to human reasoning, enabling both inference and decision-making.
  • Mental simulations and the identification of controllable elements are key to creating alternatives.
  • Imagination serves as the core engine driving various aspects of the mind.