Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Method of Treating Sialorrhea
Published on: November 9, 2016
Botulinum Toxin Type A for Myogenous Temporomandibular Disorders, Focusing on the Duration of Clinical Effects and
Ilan Hudson Gomes de Santana1, Katia Caetana Pereira2, Samuel Emiliano Monte Leite3
1Academic League of Anatomy and Orofacial Harmonization, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil. ilan.hudson@academico.ufpb.br.
Background:
Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has been increasingly investigated as a therapeutic option for myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD), yet uncertainties remain regarding the duration of its clinical effects and the relevance of dosing parameters.
Objective:
To systematically evaluate the clinical effects, duration of action, and dosage parameters of BoNT-A in the management of myogenous temporomandibular disorders.
Methods:
This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS. Randomized clinical trials evaluating BoNT-A for myogenous TMD were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tool were performed independently. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was conducted.
Results:
Ten randomized clinical trials were included. Pain was assessed using validated instruments, including the Visual Analog Scale, Characteristic Pain Intensity, and Numeric Rating Scale. Pain reduction over time was reported in both BoNT-A and control groups, including placebo and conservative therapies. In placebo-controlled trials, BoNT-A did not consistently demonstrate superiority over saline injections. Greater pain reductions were reported in studies involving refractory myofascial pain. Improvements in mandibular function were observed in both intervention and control groups. Clinical effects were generally reported to persist for 8 to 24 weeks. Current evidence is insufficient to determine whether a clinically relevant dose-response relationship exists across the evaluated regimens. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate and transient.
Conclusions:
Current evidence does not support the routine use of BoNT-A as a first-line treatment for myogenous temporomandibular disorders. Its use may be considered in selected refractory cases after failure of conservative therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which leads...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs,...
Botulism
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
