Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Comprehensive clinical benefit of CCM in HFrEF patients: a win-ratio analysis of FIX-HF-5C randomized trial
Rami Kahwash1, Poying Lai2, William T Abraham3
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, 473W 12th Avenue, Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43210-1252, USA.
Insights
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy significantly improved heart failure outcomes, enhancing patient quality of life and functional capacity. A win-ratio analysis confirmed CCM
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The FIX-HF-5C study showed Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy improved patient-centered outcomes in heart failure.
- Reductions in cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) were observed but not primary endpoints.
- A win-ratio method was used to re-analyze CCM's comprehensive clinical benefit, integrating event-driven and patient-centered outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-analyze the comprehensive clinical benefit of CCM therapy using a win-ratio method.
- To integrate event-driven clinical endpoints with patient-centered outcomes for a holistic assessment.
- To evaluate CCM therapy's effectiveness in patients with NYHA Class III versus IV heart failure.
Main Methods:
- A hierarchical win-ratio analysis prioritized cardiovascular mortality, HFH, and patient-centered outcomes.
- Patient-centered outcomes included peak oxygen consumption, quality of life (MLHFQ), 6-minute walk distance, and NYHA functional class.
- Sub-group analyses were conducted for patients with NYHA Class III versus IV.
Main Results:
- The overall win ratio was 2.48, indicating a 71% pairwise probability of clinical benefit with CCM over optimal medical therapy (OMT).
- Patient-centered outcomes contributed 56.2% to the wins, while event-driven endpoints accounted for 22%.
- CCM consistently outperformed OMT across all hierarchies, with consistent effects observed in NYHA Class III and IV subgroups.
Conclusions:
- The win-ratio re-analysis supports CCM therapy's consistent clinical benefit over OMT, integrating diverse outcome measures.
- Findings demonstrate CCM's efficacy across a hierarchical framework including both hard clinical events and patient-reported outcomes.
- While encouraging, these results are hypothesis-generating and require validation in future confirmatory studies.
Background:
FIX-HF-5C multicentre, randomized study demonstrated cardiac contractility modulation (CCMTM) improved patient-centred outcomes, including functional capacity, symptom burden, and health-related quality of life. Reductions in cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) were observed. These event-driven outcomes were not prespecified efficacy endpoints and were not incorporated into overall assessment of treatment benefit. Comprehensive clinical benefit of CCM therapy was re-analyzed by a win-ratio method that integrated event-driven clinical endpoints with patient-centred outcomes.
Methods:
The hierarchical win-ratio prioritized cardiovascular mortality, HFH, and patient-centred outcomes comprising equally weighted components of peak oxygen consumption, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, 6-minute walk distance, and NYHA functional class. Sub-group analyses were performed in patients with NYHA Class III versus IV.
Results:
In the primary analysis of 160 randomized patients (6364 patient pairs), the overall win ratio was 2.48 (95% CI 1.76 to 3.64; P < .001), corresponding to a 71% pairwise comparative probability of clinical benefit with CCM versus OMT. Event-driven clinical endpoints accounted for 22% of total wins while 56.2% came from patient-centric endpoints. CCM consistently outperformed OMT across all hierarchies. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar findings with win ratios favouring CCM (range: 1.52 to 2.42). Treatment effects were consistent across NYHA class III and IV subgroups.
Conclusions:
The win-ratio re-analysis supports and extends the original study results demonstrating a consistent clinical benefit of CCM therapy over OMT across a hierarchical framework integrating event-driven clinical endpoints with patient-centred functional outcomes. The findings, while clinically highly encouraging, are hypothesis-generating and warrant validation in future confirmatory studies.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy