Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Social Context Considerations for Future HIV Vaccine Introduction and Implementation.

Vaccines·2026

Same author

Hubris in the age of intelligent medicine-from clinical hierarchies to algorithmic amplification.

NPJ digital medicine·2026

Same author

Does Misinformation Have Spillover Effects on Unrelated Health Behaviors? Promising Null Results from a Longitudinal Study of U.S. Adults.

Journal of health communication·2026

Same author

Does gender expression matter in tailoring anti-smoking messages for sexual and gender minority young adults?

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2026

Same author

Leveraging AI for Analysis of Digital Health Information on Cancer Prevention Among Arab Youth and Adults: Content Analysis.

JMIR infodemiology·2026

Same author

Trust is a verb: how to reimagine confidence in health systems.

Health promotion international·2026

Same journal

Stress Buffering Through Online Social Support Under Offline Constraints.

Journal of health communication·2026

Same journal

Popular Attitudes Toward Vaccination During the Initial COVID-19 Vaccination Rollout (December 2020-May 2021): A Social Media Analysis.

Journal of health communication·2026

Same journal

Amplification Chambers and Belief Persistence in Commercial Health Communication.

Journal of health communication·2026

Same journal

User-Driven Fact-Checking Behavior, Motivational Barriers and Expertise Asymmetry in Health Communication: A Large-Scale Online Experiment.

Journal of health communication·2026

Same journal

A Scalability Assessment of an Organizational Health Literacy Initiative to Support Health Professionals in Developing Quality Consumer Information.

Journal of health communication·2026

Same journal

Research Priorities for Readability Assessment of Health Information: A Modified eDelphi Study.

Journal of health communication·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Published on: October 1, 2007

Misinformation About Science is a Systems-Level Dilemma.

Brian G Southwell^1,2, Nadine J Barrett^3,4, David Scales⁵

¹Fellows Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

Journal of Health Communication

|June 24, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new report from the National Academies offers strategies to combat science misinformation. It provides actionable recommendations for health professionals and community leaders to address health concerns effectively.

Keywords:

Consensus Study Information quality,Misinformation

More Related Videos

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Published on: October 1, 2007

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Area of Science:

Science communication
Public health
Information science

Background:

Misinformation about science poses significant challenges to public understanding and trust.
A diverse committee of experts convened to address this critical issue.

Purpose of the Study:

To publish a comprehensive report on understanding and addressing science misinformation.
To provide actionable recommendations for various stakeholders.

Main Methods:

A multi-year collaborative investigation and decision-making process.
Expert consensus-building among representatives from various backgrounds.

Main Results:

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine published a Consensus Study Report.
The report, "Understanding and Addressing Misinformation about Science," offers key findings.

Conclusions:

The report's recommendations are crucial for medical and public health professionals.
Health information providers and community supporters can utilize the findings to address health concerns.