Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

10:38
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Limits on selecting multiple items from working memory: the role of context and item competition
Chen Tiferet-Dweck1,2, Steven Zamora-Romero1, Kerstin Unger1,2
1Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.
Frontiers in Cognition
|June 24, 2026
Summary
Selecting multiple items from working memory (WM) is slower due to competing spatial contexts, not the number of items. This research clarifies the bottleneck in multi-item WM retrieval.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Memory
Background:
- Working memory (WM) is crucial for goal-directed behavior, requiring flexible and efficient content access.
- Simultaneous selection of multiple WM contents is slower and more error-prone than single-item selection.
- Prior research indicates a performance decline in multi-item WM access, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mechanisms causing the performance decline in multi-item working memory selection.
- To differentiate between competition among memory items versus competition among context representations as the source of the selection bottleneck.
- To clarify the principles guiding the simultaneous retrieval of multiple contents from working memory.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a spatial retrocuing paradigm across five experiments.
- Independently manipulated the number of cued spatial locations (contexts) and the number of to-be-selected memory items.
- Measured selection speed and accuracy to assess performance.
Main Results:
- Cueing two spatial locations significantly delayed selection compared to cueing one, irrespective of the number of relevant items.
- The number of relevant items (set size) had a smaller and less consistent impact on selection speed.
- These findings consistently point to spatial context competition as a primary factor.
Conclusions:
- The bottleneck in multi-item working memory selection stems from the cognitive load associated with using multiple spatial contexts for retrieval.
- Efficient working memory relies on managing contextual information to access multiple memory contents simultaneously.
- Future research should explore strategies for mitigating context-driven competition in working memory.
Keywords:
context competitiondual-accessitem competitionmulti-item accessoutput gatingretrocuingworking memoryworking memory selection
