Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Signal enhancement, not active suppression, follows the contingent capture of visual attention.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2017
Same author

Inhibition of return to an occluded object depends on expectation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2005
Same author

Sensory mediation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays.

Perception & psychophysics·2003
Same author

Goal-driven modulation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays.

Perception & psychophysics·2003
Same author

Effect of a concurrent auditory task on visual search performance in a driving-related image-flicker task.

Human factors·2002
Same journal

Asking the right questions: interrogating the logic and assumptions of paradigms used to investigate interactions between procedural and declarative memory in category learning.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same journal

Pulling away from the trigger: the influences of purpose in life and self-affirmation on decisions to shoot.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same journal

The effect of task-irrelevant objects in spatial contextual cueing.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same journal

Decreasing the proportion of conflict does not help to exploit congruency cues in a Stroop task.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same journal

How sleep and fatigue shape statements in evidence: A psycho-legal perspective.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same journal

Evolving perspectives of medial temporal memory function: hippocampal processes in visual and auditory forms of episodic and working memory.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Detecting Multiple Simultaneous And Sequential Feature Changes.
  1. Home
  3. Detecting Multiple Simultaneous And Sequential Feature Changes.

Related Experiment Video

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

Detecting multiple simultaneous and sequential feature changes.

Richard D Wright1, Amelia C Pellaers1, Ryan T deKergommeaux1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Frontiers in Cognition
|June 24, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Change blindness, the failure to notice object changes, is explored using the flicker task. Greater changes and multiple simultaneous feature changes accelerate detection, suggesting memory

Keywords:
attentionchange detectionchange magnitudeflicker tasksequential presentationvisual search

Related Experiment Videos

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Change blindness is the failure to notice changes in visual stimuli.
  • The flicker task is a common method for studying change blindness.
  • Two main theories explain change blindness: incomplete memory representations and comparison failures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the roles of memory representation integrity and comparison failure in change blindness.
  • To examine how varying degrees of feature-based changes affect change detection.
  • To explore the impact of sequential versus simultaneous feature changes on memory representations.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted flicker task experiments using non-photographic stimuli (colored lines).
  • Manipulated the degree of feature-based changes (single vs. multiple, sequential vs. simultaneous).
  • Measured change detection times and same/different comparison efficiency.

    • Main Results:

    • Increased degrees of change led to faster comparisons and detection.
    • Multiple sequential feature changes were detected faster than single feature changes.
    • Multiple simultaneous feature changes were detected faster than multiple sequential feature changes.

    Conclusions:

    • Both memory representation integrity and comparison failure contribute to change blindness.
    • Memory representations of sequentially changing objects are transient and can become less complete.
    • The findings highlight the extent of memory involvement in flicker task performance.