Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Membrane-resolved epithelial electrophysiology revealed using extracellular electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EEIS).

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Mutation E300 recommended by protein language models gives ChrimsonR amplified photocurrent response.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Regional alterations of parvalbumin interneurons in human App knock-in mouse model of Alzheimer's disease pathology.

Neurobiology of aging·2026
Same author

Sub-second extracellular impedance measurement of epithelial cell monolayers using step excitations and time-domain analysis.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Sub-second Extracellular Impedance Measurement of Epithelial Cell Monolayers using Step Excitations and Time-domain Analysis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Screening channelrhodopsins using robotic intracellular electrophysiology and single cell sequencing.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2025
Same journal

Poisoning the Genome: Targeted Backdoor Attacks on DNA Foundation Models.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Mechanistic mathematical model of the in vitro infection dynamics of Bunyamwera and Batai viruses including MOI-dependent shortening of the eclipse phase.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

AI-Driven Lumped-Element Modeling of Human Respiratory System for Studying Voice Mechanics.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Beyond Algorithms: Conceptual Innovation in Medical Imaging AI.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Feynman Kac Reweighted Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Surface-Based Tau PET Harmonization.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Agentic Discovery of Non-Canonical Antimicrobial Peptides with AMPGAN v3.

ArXiv·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

Maximum Matching Accuracy: An Instance Segmentation Evaluation Metric Utilizing Globally Optimal Matching.

Kaden Stillwagon1, Alexandra D VandeLoo2,3, Craig R Forest1,3,4

  • 1College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 30332, Georgia, United States.

Arxiv
|June 24, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We introduce Maximum Matching Accuracy (MMA), a novel metric for evaluating instance segmentation in biological imaging. MMA offers a more stable, sensitive, and interpretable alternative to existing methods, improving cell segmentation benchmarking.

Keywords:
BenchmarkingBiological Cell SegmentationComputer VisionDeep LearningEvaluation MetricsInstance Segmentation

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

Area of Science:

  • * Computational biology
  • * Image analysis
  • * Machine learning

Background:

  • * Accurate instance segmentation is crucial for biological image analysis.
  • * Current metrics like Intersection-over-Union (IoU) have mathematical limitations, leading to unreliable model evaluations.
  • * These limitations include discontinuous scoring, sensitivity to object size, and suboptimal object matching, especially with common cell imaging failures like merged or split cells.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To develop a more robust and reliable metric for evaluating instance segmentation models in biological imaging.
  • * To address the inherent mathematical weaknesses of existing metrics.
  • * To provide a principled foundation for fair and consistent benchmarking of cell segmentation algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • * Proposed Maximum Matching Accuracy (MMA), a threshold-free, continuous metric.
  • * MMA establishes a globally optimal one-to-one matching between predicted and ground truth objects.
  • * Utilizes per-pixel normalization for aggregating total overlap, avoiding per-object normalization issues.

Main Results:

  • * MMA demonstrated more stable, sensitive, and interpretable scores compared to AP@50, PQ, SEG, and AJI.
  • * Evaluation across synthetic failures, corruption tests, and model ranking comparisons confirmed MMA's superiority.
  • * MMA provides more intuitive and reliable model rankings, especially under common cell segmentation failure modes.

Conclusions:

  • * Maximum Matching Accuracy (MMA) offers a significant improvement over existing metrics for instance segmentation in biological imaging.
  • * The proposed metric provides a more principled and reliable foundation for benchmarking cell segmentation models.
  • * MMA's threshold-free and per-pixel normalization approach enhances evaluation accuracy and interpretability.