Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026
Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 15, 2024
Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) and vascularized Denervated Muscle Targets (VDMT): a preclinical
Jorge González-Prieto1,2, Mario Arenillas3, Elisa Sanz Barbero4
1Department of Plastic Surgery, Peripheral Nerve Unit, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Carretera de Toledo Km 12.5, Madrid, 28905-Getafe, Spain.
Background:
Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs) and Vascularized Denervated Muscle Targets (VDMTs) are emerging strategies for nerve regeneration and myoelectric prosthesis control. Most preclinical studies have been conducted in rodents, limiting the evaluation of implantable electromyographic devices due to anatomical and scale-related constraints. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the first RPNI and VDMT models in rabbits as a translational platform for implantable neuromuscular interfaces.
Methods:
A total of 8 rabbits (4 per group) were randomly assigned to RPNI (n = 4) and VDMT (n = 4) groups and evaluated at an 8-week follow-up. RPNIs were created using biceps femoris muscle grafts attached to the peroneal nerve. VDMTs were constructed using denervated, vascularized gastrocnemius muscle flaps sutured to a peroneal motor branch. The contralateral leg served as a denervated control. Electrophysiological and histological analyses were performed 8 weeks postoperatively. Between-group comparisons were conducted using exact Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests.
Results:
VDMTs showed a trend toward better macroscopic vascularization and integration under the present experimental conditions. Electromyographic activity was detected in 3 of 4 VDMTs, whereas no signal was observed in RPNIs. Histological analysis demonstrated more favorable muscle tissue preservation in VDMTs, with no detectable necrosis (0% necrotic area in all specimens), while RPNIs exhibited substantial necrosis (20%-95% of the analyzed muscle area), which was significantly greater than in VDMTs (p = 0.0286). Neuroma formation occurred in all RPNIs and in 2 of 4 VDMTs.
Conclusions:
This study presents a feasible rabbit model for the preclinical evaluation of RPNI and VDMT constructs. Under the present experimental conditions, VDMTs were associated with more favorable tissue preservation and more frequent signal detection under the present experimental conditions. These findings support the feasibility and translational potential of the rabbit as a methodological platform for future neuromuscular interface research. Further studies with optimized surgical protocols and larger cohorts are required to confirm these findings.
