Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Labeling Emotion

Labeling Emotion

Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Insight into Face Identity Recognition Ability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Neuropsychology review·2026

Same author

Increased sensorimotor activity during categorisation of emotionally ambiguous faces.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024

Same author

The composite effect reveals that human (but not other primate) faces are special to humans.

PloS one·2023

Same author

Social emotional processes during the third wave of COVID-19: Results from a close replication study in a Turkish sample.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2023

Same author

View specific generalisation effects in face recognition: Front and yaw comparison views are better than pitch.

PloS one·2018

Same author

About Face: Matching Unfamiliar Faces Across Rotations of View and Lighting.

i-Perception·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

Motion and intensity shape accuracy and confusion patterns in emotion recognition.

Simone Favelle¹, Özge Karakale¹, Lyndsay Menzies¹

¹School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

Cognition & Emotion

|June 25, 2026

Summary

Facial expression recognition is complex, with motion and intensity affecting accuracy differently across emotions. Dynamic cues help recognize some emotions, while static cues aid others, highlighting nuanced perception.

Keywords:

Motion basic emotion emotion recognition facial expression intensity

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

Area of Science:

Psychology
Cognitive Science
Neuroscience

Background:

Facial expression recognition is crucial for social interaction.
The interplay of motion and intensity in recognizing emotions is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how intensity and motion interact in recognizing basic facial emotions.
To determine the specific benefits of dynamic versus static facial expressions for emotion recognition.

Main Methods:

Examined recognition accuracy of six basic emotions (anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise).
Utilized static and dynamic facial expression displays across low, medium, and high intensity levels.

Main Results:

Recognition accuracy generally increased with intensity but showed complex interactions with motion and emotion type.
Dynamic cues improved recognition for joy, surprise, and anger (especially at low intensity).
Static expressions were better for recognizing disgust, fear, and sadness; motion altered fear-surprise confusion patterns.

Conclusions:

The benefits of dynamic facial information are emotion- and intensity-specific.
Motion can both aid and hinder accurate facial expression recognition depending on the emotion.
Future research should utilize dynamic stimuli to fully understand facial expression perception.