Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Method of Treating Sialorrhea
Published on: November 9, 2016
Botulinum toxin treatment for multiple sclerosis and post-stroke spasticity in clinical practice: differences in
Paolo Manganotti1,2, Alessandro Dinoto1, Giulia Mazzon2
1Neurology Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) spasticity primarily targets lower limbs with lower doses compared to post-stroke spasticity (PSS). PSS treatment more frequently involves upper limbs and distal muscles.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is a recognized treatment for spasticity in multiple sclerosis (MS) and post-stroke spasticity (PSS).
- Understanding differences in BoNT-A application between MS and PSS is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare BoNT-A injection patterns and dosages between patients with MS and PSS.
- To analyze differences in muscle targeting and dose administration for spasticity management in these two conditions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 33 patients with MS and 55 patients with PSS treated with BoNT-A.
- Data collected included demographics, BoNT-A dosages, limb-specific dosing, and injected muscle patterns.
- Comparison of treatment parameters and patient-reported benefit between the MS and PSS groups.
Main Results:
- Patients with MS received lower total BoNT-A doses, with more frequent lower limb injections (adductors, rectus femoris).
- Patients with PSS more commonly received treatment in distal upper-limb muscles (e.g., tibialis posterior in lower limbs).
- Higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores in MS correlated with higher BoNT-A dosages.
Conclusions:
- MS-related spasticity predominantly affects lower limbs, requiring lower BoNT-A doses than PSS.
- PSS spasticity is often more distal and upper-limb predominant, influencing BoNT-A treatment patterns.
- Differences in spasticity distribution and potential need to preserve motor function may explain dosage variations; treatment efficacy appears comparable.
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...
Botulism
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs,...
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which leads...
