Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

07:51
A Novel Approach to Monitoring Graft Neovascularization in the Human Gingiva
Published on: January 12, 2019
Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix With or Without Platelet-Rich Fibrin Impregnation for Multiple Gingival Recessions: A
Gabriel Leonardo Magrin1, Roberta Michels1,2, Ana Clara Kuerten Gil1
1Centre for Education and Research on Dental Implants (CEPID), Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Journal of Periodontal Research
|June 25, 2026
Summary
Adding platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to a collagen matrix did not improve gingival recession reduction. This study found no significant differences in clinical, esthetic, or patient outcomes after 6 months.
Area of Science:
- Periodontology
- Regenerative Dentistry
- Biomaterials in Oral Surgery
Background:
- Gingival recession affects numerous patients, impacting oral health and aesthetics.
- The coronally advanced flap technique is a common surgical approach for root coverage.
- Volume-stable collagen matrices are utilized to enhance surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if incorporating platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) into a collagen matrix improves gingival recession reduction.
- To compare clinical, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes between PRF-augmented and non-augmented matrices.
- To assess the efficacy of PRF in conjunction with a collagen matrix for treating gingival recessions.
Main Methods:
- A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients with maxillary RT1 recessions.
- Participants received either a PRF-impregnated or a non-impregnated collagen matrix with a coronally advanced flap.
- Clinical parameters, esthetic scores, and patient-reported outcomes were measured at baseline and 6 months.
Main Results:
- Both treatment groups showed significant improvement in recession depth over 6 months.
- No statistically significant intergroup differences were observed for recession depth, keratinized tissue width, probing depth, or clinical attachment level.
- Evaluations of Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) revealed no significant differences between the PRF-augmented and control groups.
Conclusions:
- The addition of PRF to a volume-stable collagen matrix did not yield superior results for gingival recession depth reduction.
- PRF augmentation did not significantly enhance clinical, esthetic, or patient-reported outcomes compared to the non-augmented matrix.
- Further research may be needed to explore the role of PRF in periodontal regeneration.