Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

07:45
Preclinical Positron Emission Tomography with Body Conforming Animal Molds for Cloud-Based Automated Image Analysis in Mice
Published on: October 25, 2024
Quantitative Preclinical Imaging as a Metrological Framework: Reproducibility, Validation, and Translational Maturity
Nicolò Lauciello1,2,3, Giorgio Russo2,3, Alessandro Stefano2,3
1Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, Via Archirafi 22, 90123 Palermo, Italy.
Journal of Imaging
|June 25, 2026
Summary
Quantitative preclinical imaging offers vital biomarkers for research. This review highlights technical and biological factors affecting measurement accuracy, emphasizing harmonization for reliable results.
Area of Science:
- Preclinical Imaging
- Biomarker Discovery
- Metrology
Background:
- Quantitative preclinical imaging provides non-invasive physiological and molecular insights.
- It generates measurable biomarkers crucial for longitudinal and translational research.
- Major modalities include PET, SPECT, MRI, CT, optical, and hybrid systems in murine and zebrafish models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze quantitative preclinical imaging studies (2015-2025).
- To evaluate methodological frameworks for parameter extraction, reproducibility, and validation.
- To assess the metrological maturity of harmonization infrastructure across platforms.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of 60 studies.
- Analysis of major imaging modalities (PET, SPECT, MRI, CT, optical, hybrid).
- Evaluation using a framework distinguishing technical, biological, and computational variance sources.
Main Results:
- Variability sources are technical (instrumentation, reconstruction, calibration) and biological (heterogeneity, model factors).
- The interaction of these factors governs measurement uncertainty.
- Emerging computational approaches (AI, parametric modeling) show potential but require validation.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative preclinical imaging is framed as a metrological discipline.
- Reproducibility, bias control, and cross-modality harmonization are critical.
- Robust and translationally relevant imaging biomarkers depend on these factors.

