Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
Padriac Hooper1,2, Jin Jin1,2,3,4, Kieran O'Brien1,2,3,4
1ARC Training Centre for Innovation in Biomedical Imaging Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Purpose:
To measure magnetic susceptibility (χ) with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) and evaluate its repeatability using four phantom doping materials relevant to QSM applications.
Methods:
A cylindrical phantom was constructed containing vials of agarose gel doped with two paramagnetic materials (ferritin, USPIO) and two diamagnetic materials (CaCl2, CaCO3) at five concentrations each. Single orientation QSM measurements (MEDI+0) were carried out on the phantom at 3 and 7 T. We measured molar susceptibility (χmol) from QSM and evaluated the precision of QSM measurements using the standard deviation of the ROI measurement (SDROI). We evaluated material lifespan by conducting a t-test of χmol at various timepoints.
Results:
χmol (ppm L mmol-1) were measured as 1.67 ± 0.24 and 0.74 ± 0.09 (USPIO: 3 and 7 T, respectively), 10-2 × (8.13 ± 1.35; 8.13 ± 1.19) (Ferritin: 3; 7 T), 10-4 × (-2.68 ± 0.24; -2.71 ± 0.37) (CaCl2: 3; 7 T), and 10-5 × (-9.52 ± 1.44; -9.53 ± 1.18) (CaCO3: 3; 7 T). We observed no significant changes in molar susceptibility for ferritin and CaCO3 over the measured timeframes (24 and 15 months, respectively).
Conclusion:
We recommend using ferritin as a paramagnetic dopant. Further research is required to identify a diamagnetic dopant with a lower electrical conductivity and a lower ratio of R2*/B0 to χ.

