Pictures are not always worth a thousand words: Non-probative pictures did not increase the effectiveness of misinformation corrections
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Peter S Whitehead1, Charles P Davis1, Joyce S Park1
1Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University.
Abstract:
Much research has focused on the language used for debunking false beliefs: communications should lead with facts, label misinformation as false, and reinforce true information. Pictures are used in debunking messages, but it remains unclear whether they matter, and what content they should depict. Six experiments explored these issues, focusing on correcting science misconceptions. There were no effects of non-probative pictures on correcting misinformation beyond the effects of corrective text alone. This was true regardless of whether the image depicted the misconception (Exps. 1, 3-6) or the correct referent (Exps. 2, 3, 5, 6), whether a symbol reinforcing truth or falseness (red X or green checkmark) accompanied the image (Exps. 1-6), whether belief was assessed immediately or after a delay (Exps. 4-6), and in an exploratory last experiment, whether belief in real-world health issues was targeted. Simple messages yielded robust correction, but non-probative pictorial aids did not increase their potency.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Cause and Effect
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Motivational Bias

