Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Ivabradine in Heart Transplant Recipients with Sinus Tachycardia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Khadeeja Ali Hamzah1, Yousif Hameed Kurmasha2, Waleed Mohaned Rasheed3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Alkindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract:
Sinus tachycardia is common after heart transplantation (HTx) and may worsen graft function through increased oxygen demand and remodeling. Ivabradine, a selective If channel inhibitor, lowers heart rate (HR) independently of sympathetic activity. This meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety versus standard care in HTx recipients. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, WoS, Scopus, and Cochrane was conducted through September 2025. Eligible studies included randomized and nonrandomized comparative trials. Data were pooled with a random-effects model to estimate mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. Six studies, including 852 adult HTx recipients, were included. Ivabradine consistently reduced HR across all time points. Statistical significance was reached at 24 months (MD -16.82 bpm; P = 0.04) and 36 months (MD -12.94 bpm; P = 0.04). A significant reduction was observed in left ventricular mass index (MD -11.10 g/m 2 ; 95% confidence interval -17.15 to -5.06; P < 0.05; I^2 = 0%). While left ventricular mass (LVM) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) showed trends toward improvement at the final follow-up (MD = -11.23 for LVM and +2.94% for LVEF), neither reached statistical significance ( P = 0.06 and P = 0.48, respectively). No significant differences were found between the ivabradine and control groups regarding all-cause mortality (RR 1.16 at the final follow-up; P = 0.90), graft rejection (RR 1.14; P = 0.87), or systolic blood pressure (MD 0.50 mm Hg; P = 0.83). Ivabradine lowers HR after HTx but shows no clear benefit on mortality, rejection, or ejection fraction. It does not significantly affect blood pressure, supporting its tolerability, particularly when beta-blockers are not tolerated.
More Related Videos
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System