Clinical outcome of revisional gastrectomy postgastric banding failure: A systematic review

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has been widely used for obesity management; however, its long-term failure, due to complications such as band erosion, slippage, and inadequate weight loss, has necessitated revisional bariatric procedures. Revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has emerged as a common alternative, yet its safety and efficacy remain debated.

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines; this review was prospectively registered with Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024568094). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed up to July 19, 2024. Studies published in English that reported postoperative outcomes following revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after failed LAGB were included. Data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers, focusing on patient demographics, complication rates (including leaks, bleeding, and infections), and nutritional outcomes. Quality assessment was performed using a standardized tool for observational studies, cohort and cross-sectional studies.

Fifty studies involving a total of 16,192 patients were analyzed. Patients had a mean age between 30 and 50 years and a revision body mass index ranging from 33 to 52 kg/m2. Infection was reported in 9 studies, though incidence was low. Bleeding was examined in 30 studies, with mostly isolated cases; thrombosis was reported in only 1 study. Leak rates were reported in 39 studies, ranging from 0% to 8.1%, with stage-specific rates between 2.8% and 5.8%. Four studies noted nutritional deficiencies, including increased ferritin deficiency and some cases contributing to readmission. Overall complication rates were reported in 22 studies, averaging 9.95% and ranging from 0% to 37.5%.

Revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy following failed LAGB appears to offer a safe and effective alternative, with acceptable complication rates and favorable weight loss outcomes. However, heterogeneity in study designs and patient characteristics underscores the need for standardized reporting and further research to optimize clinical protocols.