Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay02:27

Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay

The Upf proteins that carry out nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) are found in all eukaryotic organisms, including humans. Each protein has an individual role, but they need to work in collaboration. Upf1 is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase that unwinds the RNA helix. Because Upf1 can unwind any RNA, Upf2 and Upf3 are required to help Upf1 discriminate between nonsense and normal mRNAs.
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Editorial: Technologies for RNA Detection.

Bio-protocol·2026
Same author

Pattern separation memory requires Cerebellin 4 - Neogenin 1 signaling at dentate gyrus synapses.

Progress in neurobiology·2026
Same author

Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

The G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Orchestrates Hair Follicle Homeostasis.

The Journal of investigative dermatology·2025
Same author

Author Correction: GluD1 is a signal transduction device disguised as an ionotropic receptor.

Nature·2025
Same author

Universities should standardize faculty application process.

Trends in cell biology·2025
Same journal

One-Step Affinity Purification of MarathonRT Reverse Transcriptase for RNA Sequencing Applications.

Bio-protocol·2026
Same journal

Enhanced RNA-Seq Expression Profiling and Functional Enrichment in Non-model Organisms Using Custom Annotations.

Bio-protocol·2026
Same journal

Using Combined Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization With Immunohistochemistry to Co-localize mRNA in Diverse Neuronal Cell Types.

Bio-protocol·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Protocol for Alternative Splicing Analysis in Single-Cell SMART-Seq2 RNA-Seq Data.

Bio-protocol·2026
Same journal

Enriching Bacteria-Specific RNA From Host Samples Before NGS With Transcript-Capture.

Bio-protocol·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

RNA Detection Technologies: A MethodCentric Guide to Principles and Reproducibility.

Midhun Krishnan Vasanthakrishnan1, Marion Hogg2, Kif Liakath-Ali1,3

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Bio-Protocol
|June 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review synthesizes RNA detection technologies, focusing on how their principles and variability impact reproducibility. Method selection depends on biological questions and the maturity of RNA analysis reproducibility frameworks.

Keywords:
Quantitative PCRRNA detectionRNA sequencingReproducibility standardsSpatial transcriptomicsTranscriptomics

More Related Videos

The Visual Colorimetric Detection of Multi-nucleotide Polymorphisms on a Pneumatic Droplet Manipulation Platform
10:01

The Visual Colorimetric Detection of Multi-nucleotide Polymorphisms on a Pneumatic Droplet Manipulation Platform

Published on: September 27, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

The Visual Colorimetric Detection of Multi-nucleotide Polymorphisms on a Pneumatic Droplet Manipulation Platform
10:01

The Visual Colorimetric Detection of Multi-nucleotide Polymorphisms on a Pneumatic Droplet Manipulation Platform

Published on: September 27, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • RNA detection methods have evolved significantly, encompassing hybridization, amplification, imaging, and sequencing.
  • A diverse array of technologies now exists, from foundational techniques to advanced transcriptomics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a method-centric synthesis of major RNA detection technologies.
  • To emphasize how core principles, strengths, and variability influence the reproducibility of each method.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established and emerging RNA detection techniques.
  • Analysis of amplification-based (e.g., PCR, isothermal amplification) and amplification-free methods.
  • Examination of transcriptomic approaches including bulk, single-cell, long-read, directRNA, and spatial transcriptomics, alongside CRISPR-based detection and metabolic labeling.

Main Results:

  • Mature RNA detection methods have established standards, while newer approaches require experiment-specific controls for reproducibility.
  • Reproducibility is a key evaluation dimension, influenced by method maturity and variability.
  • Technological advancements offer diverse resolutions and applications for RNA analysis.

Conclusions:

  • RNA detection methods are interconnected problem-solving pathways, not mere replacements.
  • Rigorous method selection is crucial, guided by biological questions, resolution needs, sample constraints, and reproducibility frameworks.
  • Understanding method-specific variability is essential for reliable RNA detection and analysis.