Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the vertical...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

Time-Varying Treatment Effect Models in Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trials With Multiple Interventions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Doubly Robust Estimators of the Restricted Mean Time in Favor Estimands in Individual- and Cluster-Randomized Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Bayesian Inference for Cluster-Randomized Trials With Multivariate Outcomes Subject to Both Truncation by Death and Missingness.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

A tutorial on conducting sample size and power calculations for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with linear mixed models.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Simplifying debiased inference via automatic differentiation and probabilistic programming.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
Same journal

Causal K-Means Clustering.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
Same journal

Inference of dependency knowledge graph for Electronic Health Records.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Inference of dependency knowledge graph for Electronic Health Records.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
Same journal

Harmonized Estimation of Subgroup-Specific Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials: The Use of External Control Data.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
Same journal

Inference on function-valued parameters using a restricted score test.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Principal stratification with U-statistics under principal ignorability.

Xinyuan Chen1, Fan Li2,3

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology
|June 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new causal effect estimands for principal stratification, offering better summaries for ordinal outcomes and complex endpoints. These methods enhance causal inference with intermediate variables.

Keywords:
causal inferenceefficient influence functionmultiply robust estimationprincipal stratificationprobabilistic index win ratio

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Causal Inference
  • Statistical Methodology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Principal stratification is a key framework for causal inference with intermediate outcomes.
  • Standard principal average treatment effects may not capture nuanced comparisons of potential outcomes.
  • Existing methods may be insufficient for ordinal outcomes or composite endpoints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce principal generalized causal effect estimands for nonlinear contrasts.
  • Accommodate ordinal outcomes and win-loss comparisons with composite endpoints.
  • Expand theoretical results for causal estimands with binary intermediate variables.

Main Methods:

  • Develop nonparametric identification results for generalized causal estimands.
  • Derive efficient influence functions within principal stratification.
  • Motivate multiply robust and debiased machine learning estimators using cross-fitting.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrate nonparametric identification of generalized causal estimands.
  • Provide efficient influence functions for robust estimation.
  • Establish foundations for efficient debiased machine learning estimators.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed generalized causal effect estimands offer robust, probability-scale summaries.
  • The methods extend causal inference capabilities for complex outcome types.
  • The framework facilitates advanced statistical analysis in principal stratification.