Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

05:25
Simultaneous Detection of Different Antibody Classes in a Multiplexed Serological Test
Published on: July 14, 2023
Syphilis Serology and Antiphospholipid Antibodies: Bidirectional Reactivity Testing across Clinical and Control
Xiaomin Shi1, Fengtian Feng1, Kaisong Hu1
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
|June 29, 2026
Summary
Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) elevations in syphilis are transient and not indicative of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Modern syphilis tests (RPR and TP-CMIA) remain reliable for patients with existing aPL positivity.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Infectious Diseases
- Serology
Background:
- Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) can occur during infections like syphilis, potentially causing diagnostic confusion with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
- Limited research exists on the bidirectional interactions between contemporary syphilis serology assays and aPL testing.
- Understanding these interactions is crucial for accurate diagnosis and patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential diagnostic overlap between syphilis and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
- To evaluate the reactivity of syphilis serology assays with antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) assays.
- To determine if syphilis-associated aPLs represent true autoimmunity or transient cross-reactivity.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed residual sera from syphilis patients (TP-CMIA+/RPR+), aPL-positive individuals, and healthy controls.
- Utilized EUROIMMUN ELISAs for aPL testing and Abbott ARCHITECT TP-CMIA and Kehua RPR for syphilis testing.
- Performed proteome-level 3D homology search to assess epitope mimicry.
Main Results:
- No analytical cross-reactivity was found between syphilis and aPL assay reagents.
- Patients with untreated syphilis showed elevated anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) IgG and IgM, which were transient and not associated with anti-β2GPI.
- A small percentage of syphilis patients tested positive for aPLs, but these did not correlate with syphilis assay signals, and only one autoimmune aPL-positive sample was reactive in syphilis assays.
Conclusions:
- Elevated aPLs in syphilis are transient, anti-β2GPI-independent reactivity, not indicative of APS-type autoimmunity.
- Structural analysis did not support β2GPI epitope mimicry by Treponema pallidum.
- Combined RPR and TP-CMIA testing is reliable for patients with pre-existing aPL positivity.

