Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

An Improved and High Throughput Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Micro-neutralization Assay
Published on: January 26, 2019
Adverse events and vaccine administration errors following RSV vaccination: Findings from the United States VAERS
Lotanna Ezeja1, Oluchukwu M Ezeala1, Salisa C Westrick1
1Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Introduction:
Three respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines are marketed in the U.S. for use in adults aged ≥18 years: Arexvy® (GSK), Abrysvo® (Pfizer), and mRESVIA® (Moderna), with only Abrysvo® approved for use during pregnancy. This study describes post-marketing adverse event (AE) reports after RSV vaccination and detected reporting risk signals of administration-related errors using the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
Methods:
We searched the VAERS database for reports of AE following RSV vaccination during January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2025. We assessed the characteristics of these reports and described the most commonly reported AEs by RSV vaccine brand. The top 15 most frequently reported AEs and top 10 most frequently reported vaccine administration errors were examined for Arexvy® and Abrysvo®. Disproportionality analyses (reporting odds ratio) were conducted to detect disproportionate reporting risk signals of vaccine administration errors (SAS version 9.4).
Results:
During the study period, VAERS received 8365 AE reports following RSV vaccination; most were after Arexvy® (68.2%) and Abrysvo® (29.9%). The 5 most frequently reported AEs for Arexvy® were extra dose administered (15.0%), injection site pain (12.8%), injection site erythema (11.3%), injection site swelling (9.0%), and pain (9.0%); while for Abrysvo®, they included exposure during pregnancy (10.6%), extra dose administered (9.9%), headache (7.7%), fatigue (7.7%) and injection site pain (7.3%). Although not recommended for use during the study period, 4.2% (n = 244) of reports after Arexvy® vaccination were from individuals <50 years old; 6.6% (n = 375) were exposure during pregnancy. Both Arexvy® and Abrysvo® exhibited significant signals for vaccine administration errors such as extra dose administered and product administered to patient of inappropriate age.
Conclusions:
Most AE reports following RSV vaccination were non-serious. The potential misuse of Arexvy® during pregnancy and excess dose for both Arexvy® and Abrysvo® highlight potential gaps in healthcare provider education and vaccine record retrieval.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Vaccinations
Vaccines
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...

