Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

12:27
Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver
Published on: June 16, 2023
Surgeon-controlled robotic CUSA technique for liver parenchymal transection
Takuya Minagawa1, Osamu Itano2, Toshitaka Sugawara1
1Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, 852 Hatakeda, Narita-Shi, Chiba, 286-0124, Japan.
Surgical Endoscopy
|June 30, 2026
Summary
A new surgeon-controlled robotic CUSA technique for liver resection offers comparable outcomes to the traditional clamp-crush method. This innovation enhances console surgeon autonomy and reproducibility in robotic liver surgery.
Area of Science:
- Minimally invasive surgery
- Surgical technology
- Hepatobiliary surgery
Background:
- Robotic liver resection offers improved visualization but often requires bedside assistance for parenchymal transection, limiting surgeon control.
- A novel surgeon-controlled robotic CUSA (cavitational ultrasonic surgical aspirator) technique was developed using a simple attachment.
- This technique aims to increase console surgeon autonomy during robotic liver resections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the surgeon-controlled robotic CUSA technique for liver resection.
- To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of this technique compared to the conventional clamp-crush method.
- To assess the feasibility and safety of enhanced surgeon control in robotic parenchymal transection.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 44 patients undergoing robotic liver resection (October 2022 - December 2025).
- Comparison between the clamp-crush technique (early period) and the surgeon-controlled robotic CUSA technique (later period).
- Procedures performed by expert hepatobiliary surgeons using da Vinci Xi or hinotori robotic systems; outcomes analyzed statistically.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in perioperative outcomes (operation time, blood loss, complications, hospital stay, R0 resection) between the clamp-crush (19 patients) and robotic CUSA (25 patients) groups.
- Major or segmental resections were more frequent in the robotic CUSA group, though not statistically significant.
- No conversions to open or laparoscopic surgery were reported in either group.
Conclusions:
- The surgeon-controlled robotic CUSA technique achieves comparable perioperative outcomes to the clamp-crush method.
- This technique allows for surgeon-controlled parenchymal transection, enhancing autonomy in robotic liver surgery.
- It presents a valuable option for selected robotic liver resections in experienced centers.
Keywords:
Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA)Minimally invasive surgeryParenchymal transectionRobotic liver resectionSurgeon-controlled technique
