Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

The Synthesis, Characterization and Reactivity of a Series of Ruthenium N-triphosPh Complexes
Published on: April 10, 2015
Ligand-dependent electronic structure, bonding, and optical properties of M(L)(CO)2 complexes (L = acac, Cp, Cp; M =
Renjith Thomas1,2, Ali A Khairbek3, Abdullah Yahya Abdullah Alzahrani4
1Department of Chemistry, St Berchmans College (Autonomous), Changanassery, Kerala, India-686101. renjith@sbcollege.ac.in.
Abstract:
Transition-metal carbonyl complexes display rich electronic structures governed by the interplay of metal d orbitals and ligand π systems. Here, a systematic DFT and TD-DFT study was performed on 27 complexes of the type M(L)(CO)2 (M = Fe, Co, Ni, Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, Pt; L = acac, Cp, Cp*). Geometry optimizations, Mayer bond orders, ADCH charges, frontier molecular orbital energies, and global reactivity descriptors were evaluated at the MN12-L/def2-TZVP level. Scalar relativistic effects for the 4d (Ru, Rh, Pd) and 5d (Os, Ir, Pt) metals are implicitly included through the Stuttgart-Cologne small-core relativistic effective core potentials (ECP28MWB and ECP60MWB) that accompany def2-TZVP. Electronic absorption spectra were simulated in cyclohexane via TD-DFT with Gaussian convolution (σ = 20 nm) to obtain realistic λmax values. The results reveal a recurrent ligand-dependent pattern: more ionic acac ligands consistently induce a more positive metal charge, longer M-C(CO) bond lengths (1.77-1.99 Å) and lower Mayer bond orders relative to those of the covalent Cp and Cp* analogs. The HOMO-LUMO gap is wider for acac than for the corresponding Cp/Cp* derivative in seven of the nine metals studied; the three d8 M(I) cases (Co, Rh, Ir) are clear exceptions in which Cp/Cp* widens the gap further owing to strong covalent donation. The computed MLCT energies, ADCH-charge orderings and CO stretching frequencies for the Ir benchmark series are in quantitative agreement with recently reported HERFD-XAS, VtC-RIXS and infrared data. This work provides a comprehensive understanding of how ancillary-ligand ionicity modulates the metal-ligand bonding, charge distribution, and optical properties of organometallic carbonyl complexes.
More Related Videos
09:45Accessing Valuable Ligand Supports for Transition Metals: A Modified, Intermediate Scale Preparation of 1,2,3,4,5-Pentamethylcyclopentadiene
Published on: March 20, 2017
07:24Hyperspectral Imaging as a Tool to Study Optical Anisotropy in Lanthanide-Based Molecular Single Crystals
Published on: April 14, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...