Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Retrospective Study of Spectrum of Breast Lesions in a Teaching Institution in Ganganagar and Their Cyto-histopathological Correlation.

Indian journal of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Evolving Treatments and Resistance Mechanisms in Prostate Cancer Therapeutics.

ACS pharmacology & translational science·2026
Same author

Deciphering Seedling-Stage Salinity Stress Tolerance in Maize Genotypes Through Morpho-Physiological and Ionic Traits.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Prostate cancer: metabolic remodelling in expressed prostatic secretions reveals cellular structural changes measured by mpMRI.

Molecular omics·2026
Same author

Spin polarized first principles study of electro-magnetic and optical properties of K<sub>2</sub>NaXI<sub>6</sub> (X :Cr Fe) double halide perovskites.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Estimating the distribution of fitness effects of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events using an engineered library of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

PLoS genetics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
07:34

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization

Published on: November 17, 2023

Comparison of Gleason Scoring-2005 and 2014 Updates.

Cherry Bansal1, Gurupriya Anand2, Anshika Goyal3

  • 1Department of Pathology, Dr. S S Tantia Medical College, Hospital & Research Center, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan India.

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology
|July 1, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The 2014 Gleason scoring update for prostate cancer improved reproducibility and prognosis prediction compared to the 2005 system. This revised grading system simplifies scoring and reduces variability among pathologists.

Keywords:
CancerGleason scoreISUPProstate

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
07:34

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization

Published on: November 17, 2023

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • The Gleason grading system is crucial for prostate cancer prognostication.
  • Prostate cancer is a globally prevalent malignancy affecting men worldwide.
  • Previous versions of the Gleason score have undergone revisions to improve accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare changes in Gleason scoring between the 2005 and 2014 updates.
  • To evaluate the impact of the 2014 Gleason guidelines on prostate cancer grading.
  • To assess shifts in final scores and grade groups post-2014 update.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 88 prostate biopsy specimens.
  • Re-evaluation of specimens using the 2014 Gleason scoring guidelines.
  • Comparison of final scores and grade group assignments between 2005 and 2014 criteria.

Main Results:

  • 67 out of 88 cases maintained the same total Gleason score.
  • Significant changes in total scores were observed in 21 cases (9 upgraded, 12 downgraded).
  • The 2014 update demonstrated improved reproducibility and reduced interobserver variability.

Conclusions:

  • The 2014 Gleason scoring update offers a simpler and more effective prognostic tool.
  • Adoption of the 2014 guidelines enhances consistency in prostate cancer grading.
  • The revised system is a better predictor of patient outcomes.