Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Murine Model of Leukemia Relapse to Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published on: October 17, 2025
Relapse Thresholds (12/24 Mo) Define Survival Disparity in Pediatric B-ALL
Binjun Xiong1,2, Jianwen Zhou3, Xuhan Zhang4
1Precision Oncology and Intelligent Theranostics Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Insights
Progression of disease within 12 months (POD12) and 24 months (POD24) are critical indicators for poor survival in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). These data-driven landmarks help identify high-risk patients early.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Hematologic Malignancies
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) relapse significantly impacts patient survival.
- Accurate prognostic markers are crucial for risk stratification and treatment optimization in B-ALL.
- Existing endpoints may not adequately capture early disease progression and its survival implications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze relapse patterns in pediatric B-ALL to define clinically relevant prognostic thresholds.
- To establish practical, data-driven landmarks for identifying patients with adverse survival outcomes.
- To evaluate the potential of early progression landmarks as candidate endpoints for clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of relapse patterns in over 5,800 pediatric B-ALL patients from TARGET, MP2PRT, and four external validation cohorts.
- Monthly landmark-based Cox proportional hazards analyses to identify peak hazard ratios and statistical significance.
- Selection and validation of Progression of Disease within 12 months (POD12) and 24 months (POD24) as key prognostic landmarks.
Main Results:
- POD12 and POD24 were identified as clinically practical landmarks, with POD12 occurring in 2.56% and POD24 in 8.67% of patients in the primary cohorts.
- Patients experiencing POD12 had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 11.13%, versus 90.89% for non-POD12 patients.
- Patients experiencing POD24 had a 5-year OS of 36.19%, versus 93.62% for non-POD24 patients, consistent across validation cohorts.
- E2A-PBX1 and MLL rearrangements were associated with an increased risk of POD12 and POD24.
Conclusions:
- POD12 and POD24 serve as robust, clinically practical landmarks for identifying pediatric B-ALL patients with significantly inferior survival.
- These landmarks provide valuable prognostic information, aiding in risk stratification.
- POD12 and POD24 may serve as hypothesis-generating candidate early trial endpoints for progression-free survival in future pediatric B-ALL studies.
Abstract:
This study systematically analyzed relapse patterns in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) across 2930 patients from the TARGET and MP2PRT cohorts, with an additional 2972 patients from four independent external validation cohorts, to define clinically relevant prognostic thresholds. Monthly landmark-based Cox analyses identified 13 months as the time point with the peak hazard ratio (HR = 31.97) and 27 months as the time point with the maximum -log10P value (158.08); given the small differences from 12 and 24 months and their greater clinical practicality, POD12 (progression of disease within 12 months) and POD24 (progression of disease within 24 months) were selected as clinically practical landmarks for subsequent analyses. In the TARGET and MP2PRT cohorts, POD12 occurred in 2.56% of patients and POD24 in 8.67%. Patients with POD12 had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 11.13% versus 90.89% in non-POD12 patients, whereas patients with POD24 had a 5-year OS of 36.19% versus 93.62% in non-POD24 patients. In all four external validation cohorts, POD12 and POD24 were likewise associated with significantly inferior OS compared with their respective non-POD groups. In univariate analyses, E2A-PBX1 and MLL rearrangements were associated with increased risk of POD12 and POD24. These findings support POD12 and POD24 as clinically practical, data-driven landmarks for identifying patients with adverse survival outcomes. They may also inform the exploratory evaluation of 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival as hypothesis-generating candidate early trial endpoints, pending prospective validation.
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups