Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
Published on: June 3, 2020
FTLD-TDP versus LATE-NC: Experience of a Brain Bank specializing in FTLD-TDP
D Luke Fischer1, Salvatore Spina1, Bruce L Miller1
1Edward and Pearl Fein Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences University of California San Francisco California USA.
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP) and limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE-NC) are distinct diseases. Clinicopathological analysis confirmed differences in age, genetics, and overall pathology, supporting separate diagnostic entities.
Area of Science:
- Neuropathology
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- TDP-43 Proteinopathies
Background:
- Similarities between FTLD-TDP and LATE-NC create diagnostic ambiguity.
- Existing literature often overrepresents LATE-NC cases compared to FTLD-TDP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare FTLD-TDP (specifically type A) and LATE-NC using clinicopathological data.
- To determine if these conditions represent distinct entities or a disease spectrum.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a clinicopathological cohort (N=148) from UCSF.
- Comparison of demographic, clinical, genetic, and neuropathological features of FTLD-TDP type A (N=39) and LATE-NC (N=42).
Main Results:
- FTLD-TDP type A cases were younger, had shorter disease duration, and more genetic causes (GRN, C9ORF72) than sporadic, older LATE-NC cases.
- TDP-43 immunostaining in the middle frontal gyrus alone was insufficient for differentiation.
- Combined neuropathological features allowed differentiation with >95% confidence.
Conclusions:
- FTLD-TDP and LATE-NC are distinct neuropathological entities.
- Comprehensive neuropathological assessment is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Long-term Depression
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over time, all...
Long-term Depression

