Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults
Published on: February 12, 2020
PRISM-MX for Post-Stroke Spasticity: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation in a Mexican
Roberto C Pech-Argüelles1, Axel V Ortiz-Chávez1, Ana R Abreo-Hernández1
1Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hospital General Regional No. 1 "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez", Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
None:
ObjectiveTo perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM) into Mexican Spanish and to examine the internal consistency and preliminary convergent validity of the PRISM-MX in adults with post-stroke spasticity.MethodsThis cross-sectional pilot study included 30 adults with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and clinically confirmed spasticity attending an outpatient rehabilitation clinic in Merida, Mexico. Cross-cultural adaptation followed standard procedures, including forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and cognitive debriefing. Preliminary psychometric evaluation included descriptive item-level analysis, internal consistency of the original 41-item PRISM-MX version, and exploratory correlations with disability, motor performance, and quality-of-life measures.ResultsThe Mexican Spanish version was considered understandable, culturally relevant, and acceptable by participants during cognitive debriefing. The original 41-item PRISM-MX version was retained, and no item deletion was performed based on the present pilot sample. No missing PRISM-MX item responses were observed. Internal consistency was high for the total score (Cronbach's alpha = .956). Higher PRISM-MX scores were significantly associated with greater disability and poorer quality of life, with correlation coefficients ranging from ρ = -.46 to ρ = .61, supporting preliminary convergent validity.ConclusionsPRISM-MX was successfully cross-culturally adapted and showed preliminary evidence of acceptability, high internal consistency, and clinically plausible associations with disability and quality-of-life indicators. Definitive psychometric validation, including structural validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, measurement error, and measurement invariance, remains pending.
