Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural mechanisms of credit assignment for delayed outcomes during contingent learning.

eLife·2025
Same author

A Neural Network Model of Continual Learning with Cognitive Control.

CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference·2023
Same author

COVID-19 Vaccine Fact-Checking Posts on Facebook: Observational Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2022
Same author

Publisher Correction: Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample.

Nature human behaviour·2022
Same author

Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample.

Nature human behaviour·2022
Same author

Complementary Structure-Learning Neural Networks for Relational Reasoning.

CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference·2021
Same journal

Two-factor synaptic plasticity enables memory consolidation during neuronal burst firing.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

On phase transitions to interdisciplinary and convergent research.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Confident judgments of (mis)information veracity are more, rather than less, accurate.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Can AI help reduce prejudice? Evaluating the effectiveness of AI-powered personalized persuasion on support for transgender rights.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

A cultural explanation for parole decisions in the United States.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

A transformer-based language model reveals developmental constraint and network complexity during zebrafish embryogenesis.

PNAS nexus·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Novel Object Exploration as a Potential Assay for Higher Order Repetitive Behaviors in Mice
08:28

Novel Object Exploration as a Potential Assay for Higher Order Repetitive Behaviors in Mice

Published on: August 20, 2016

Individual curiosity modulates exploration in sequential book selection.

Xuanjun Gong1, Erie Boorman2, Cuihua Shen3

  • 1Department of Communication & Journalism, Texas A&M University, 456 Ross St, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

PNAS Nexus
|July 3, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People choose books by generalizing from familiar titles and exploring new ones with uncertain outcomes. Curiosity drives this exploration-exploitation balance, enhancing reading enjoyment in vast information landscapes.

Keywords:
curiosityexplorationinformation seekingmedia selection

More Related Videos

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Novel Object Exploration as a Potential Assay for Higher Order Repetitive Behaviors in Mice
08:28

Novel Object Exploration as a Potential Assay for Higher Order Repetitive Behaviors in Mice

Published on: August 20, 2016

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Information Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Information seeking is often viewed as curiosity-driven exploration, akin to foraging for resources.
  • It's unclear if decision mechanisms like reward generalization and directed exploration apply to knowledge and information domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how people select sequential reading materials in large, unfamiliar content environments.
  • To determine if foraging mechanisms generalize to semantic spaces of knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large-scale real-world dataset of sequential book selections.
  • A controlled behavioral experiment to observe reading choices.

Main Results:

  • Book selection is influenced by structured generalization within a semantic embedding space.
  • Readers engage in directed exploration towards options with high uncertainty.
  • Individual curiosity levels impact the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, affecting reading enjoyment.

Conclusions:

  • Computational mechanisms of foraging extend to epistemic domains, guiding media selection.
  • Understanding these mechanisms provides insight into how people navigate and learn from information.