Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

An Integrated Workflow to Study the Promoter-Centric Spatio-Temporal Genome Architecture in Scarce Cell Populations
Published on: April 21, 2023
Intrinsic promoter responsiveness dictates sensitivity to transcriptional activation by enhancers
Yingxuan Tan1,2,3, Judhajeet Ray4,5, Maya U Sheth2,3,6
1Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Abstract:
Enhancers activate specific target promoters, but whether intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility contributes to this specificity is debated. Recent studies using different reporter assays have reached contradictory conclusions. We compare six reporter assay designs, identify confounders that bias compatibility measurements, and apply improved assays to test 25,000 enhancer-promoter pairs. Promoters differ in their responsiveness to enhancers (>100-fold versus 1.1-fold activation) while enhancers activate all promoters in a similar rank order. Promoter output scales with enhancer activity following a power law, with the exponent varying across promoters. Incorporating this exponent into the Activity-by-Contact model improves prediction of endogenous enhancer effects, explaining why certain active genes are insensitive to distal perturbations and "skipped" by enhancers. Responsiveness is modulated by transcription factor motifs in the core promoter. This work establishes responsiveness as an intrinsic promoter property that enables specific promoters to be highly activated in a landscape of broadly compatible enhancers, while others remain unaffected.
Related Concept Videos
RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region
Eukaryotic Transcription Activators
The binding domains are capable of recognizing and interacting with regulatory sequences on the DNA. These domains are...
Transcription Factors
Transcription Factors

