Reevaluating the Use of Race/Ethnicity in the MESA Risk Score

Quinn White1, Spencer Hansen1, Brittany Saldivar Murphy2

  • 1University of Washington Seattle WA USA.

Insights

A new race-free MESA risk score estimates coronary heart disease risk comparably to the original. This cardiovascular disease tool performs similarly in calibration and discrimination, offering a more inclusive approach.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular disease research
  • Biostatistics
  • Public health

Background:

  • Cardiovascular disease risk scores are widely used in clinical practice and research.
  • The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) risk score estimates 10-year coronary heart disease risk.
  • The original MESA score incorporated race/ethnicity, necessitating careful consideration of its inclusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a race-free version of the MESA risk score.
  • To compare the performance of the race-free MESA score against the original score.
  • To assess the impact of removing race/ethnicity on cardiovascular risk prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the MESA cohort (individuals aged 45-84, free of prevalent cardiovascular disease).
  • Employed a 2-step regularization procedure: LASSO for variable selection and ridge regression for preventing overfitting.
  • Excluded race/ethnicity and interaction terms with race/ethnicity as candidate predictors.

Main Results:

  • The race-free MESA risk score achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.820 (95% CI, 0.801-0.840).
  • No significant difference was observed in the area under the ROC curve compared to the original score (estimate, 0.0032).
  • The discrimination slope for the race-free model (0.101) was comparable to the original MESA risk score (0.0937).

Conclusions:

  • A race-free MESA risk score was successfully developed.
  • The race-free score demonstrates comparable calibration and discrimination to the original MESA risk score.
  • This study provides a validated, race-independent tool for cardiovascular disease risk assessment.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture01:27

Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture

Adolescents from ethnic minority backgrounds face a multifaceted journey in forming their identities, shaped by the intersections of cultural expectations and personal exploration. For these adolescents, identity formation involves not only typical developmental challenges but also navigating the perceptions and attitudes of the majority culture. As they grow, adolescents in ethnic minority groups often become increasingly aware of stereotypes, social biases, and discrimination, all of which...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison01:27

Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison

Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...