Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Is It My Responsibility? Professional Organizations' Perspectives on Disability Inclusion in Health Professions
Janet Suen1, Julia Pierce1, Laura Nimmon2
1Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Professional organizations face challenges including limited awareness and systemic barriers in supporting students and practitioners with disabilities in health and human services professions. Addressing these requires dismantling ableist discourses for equitable inclusion.
Area of Science:
- Disability Studies
- Health Professions Education
- Social Sciences
Background:
- Disabled healthcare professionals possess valuable expertise but encounter systemic barriers in education and practice.
- This study investigates professional organizations' perspectives on including students requiring accommodations (SRA) and practitioners requiring accommodations (PRA) in health and human service (HHS) professions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the perspectives of Canadian professional organizations regarding the inclusion of students and practitioners with disabilities in HHS professions.
- To identify challenges and organizational policies impacting the inclusion of SRA/PRA.
- To understand the perceived roles of professional organizations in supporting SRA/PRA.
Main Methods:
- An exploratory qualitative design utilizing a critical disability studies lens.
- Semistructured interviews were conducted with 28 representatives from 10 HHS professions in Canada.
- Data analysis focused on identifying themes related to perceived roles, challenges, and policy impacts on SRA/PRA inclusion.
Main Results:
- Three key themes emerged: "We do not know what we do not know," "not our responsibility," and "between a rock and a hard place."
- Many participants indicated this was the first time they had considered SRA/PRA within their organizational mandate.
- Limited awareness, uncertainty regarding responsibility (often prioritizing public protection), and systemic obstacles hinder inclusive policy implementation.
Conclusions:
- The inclusion of SRA/PRA is a "wicked problem" influenced by tacit ableist discourses that limit agency and perpetuate marginalization.
- Despite equity mandates, systemic barriers persist, constraining the inclusion of SRA/PRA in HHS education and practice.
- The study offers insights and recommendations for dismantling barriers and promoting equitable pathways for SRA/PRA in HHS professions.
Related Concept Videos
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide comfort...
Standards of Care II
Professional Values
The values that are the foundation of the nursing profession are altruism, autonomy, human dignity, and social justice.
First, altruism refers to the concern for the welfare and well-being of others without personal...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

