Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Establishing development strategies and improvement paths for decision coach competencies in shared decision-making
Shan-Fu Yu1,2,3,4,5, Yi-Chun Lin6, Hsing-Tse Yu7
1Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Professional knowledge is key for decision coaches (DCs) supporting shared decision-making (SDM). This study evaluated DC competencies, finding that knowledge strongly influences other skills, guiding future training strategies.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Professional Development
- Patient-Centered Care
- Shared Decision-Making (SDM)
Background:
- Decision coaches (DCs) are trained professionals offering non-directive support in health decisions.
- DCs, often nurses, facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) but are not an inherent part of it.
- Core competencies for DCs are crucial, particularly in patient-centered care within nursing education.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate decision coach (DC) competencies within shared decision-making (SDM).
- To examine the accessibility, performance, and interrelationships of DC competency domains.
- To identify critical criteria for enhancing DC training and practice.
Main Methods:
- Mixed-methods study combining literature review and expert consultations.
- Cross-sectional survey of 149 healthcare professionals in Taiwan.
- Accessibility-Performance Analysis (APA) and DEMATEL-based Network Relation Map (NRM) for competency evaluation.
Main Results:
- Professional knowledge (PK) showed directional associations with outcome evaluation (OE), process management (PM), and guidance skills (GS).
- Guidance skills (GS) were highly associated with other competency domains.
- Critical criteria identified include value (PK1), listening skill (GS2), SDM resources (PM3), and practical results (OE3).
Conclusions:
- Professional knowledge is perceived as the most influential competency domain for decision coaches (DCs).
- The integrated APA-NRM approach provides evidence-based prioritization for DC competency development.
- Findings guide practical training strategies for enhancing DC effectiveness in SDM.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...