Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
Comparative Effectiveness of Carvedilol Versus Other Nonselective β-Blockers in Cirrhosis
Tracey G Simon1, Yichi Zhang2, Anna Kehoe2
1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit (CTEU), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (T.G.S.).
Background:
In cirrhosis, nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs; carvedilol, nadolol, and propranolol) reduce hepatic portal pressure and have demonstrated benefit versus placebo for preventing decompensation. Although carvedilol has emerged as the preferred NSBB, direct evidence remains limited about its effectiveness for preventing decompensation and death versus other NSBBs.
Objective:
To compare the effectiveness of carvedilol versus nadolol versus propranolol in cirrhosis.
Design:
Database cohort study.
Setting:
A U.S. administrative claims database, Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (2013 to 2025).
Participants:
Adults with cirrhosis initiating carvedilol, nadolol, or propranolol.
Measurements:
The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization for major decompensation (ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis [SBP], hepatorenal syndrome [HRS], hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal hemorrhage). Absolute risk differences (RDs) and risk ratios (RRs) at 6 months of follow-up were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting accounting for 129 preexposure covariates.
Results:
Carvedilol initiators had meaningfully lower 6-month risk for major decompensation events compared with nadolol (RD, -3.69 percentage points [95% CI, -5.33 to -2.09 percentage points]; RR, 0.80 [CI, 0.72 to 0.88]) or propranolol (RD, -2.88 percentage points [CI, -4.29 to -1.49 percentage points]; RR, 0.83 [CI, 0.76 to 0.90]). This included substantially lower 6-month risk for specific decompensation events with carvedilol compared with nadolol or propranolol, including reduced risk for variceal hemorrhage (RDs, -3.51 percentage points [CI, -4.79 to -2.20 percentage points] and -1.65 percentage points [CI, -2.71 to -0.59 percentage points], respectively) and ascites, SBP, or HRS (RDs, -3.05 percentage points [CI, -4.52 to -1.75 percentage points] and -1.58 percentage points [CI, -2.77 to -0.44 percentage points], respectively).
Limitation:
Nonrandomized treatment selection.
Conclusion:
Among U.S. patients with cirrhosis, carvedilol initiation-as opposed to nadolol or propranolol-was associated with meaningfully lower rates of major decompensation events.
Primary Funding Source:
National Institutes of Health.
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers