Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls
Published on: July 12, 2024
Comparative analysis of appearance, digestive behaviour, and nutritional quality of grilled alternative meat
Ruixian Han1, Maryam Binti Zulkifli2, Oscar Abel Sánchez Velázquez2
1School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; National Alternative Protein Innovate Centre (NAPIC), UK; The James Hutton Institute, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK.
Abstract:
A wide range of commercial meat analogues have emerged as alternatives to animal protein. This study evaluated six commercial alternative meat analogues (AMAs) against a conventional beef patty (BP), focusing on cooking behaviour, appearance, texture, digestion, and protein quality. AMAs showed distinct structural differences from BP, directly resulting in variations in cooking loss, hardness, and chewiness. Following simulated gastrointestinal digestion, AMAs released more free amino acids, whereas BP demonstrated higher overall protein digestibility. Protein quality assessment revealed that four AMAs (66.1-98.5) had higher in vitro protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (IVPDCAAS) than BP (54.8), while only one (AMA6, 72.3) showed higher in vitro digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) (BP, 64.2). This discrepancy was attributed to the complete digestibility of limiting amino acids (Cys + Met) in BP, highlighting the importance of assessing individual amino acid digestibility. Overall, AMAs show promise but require further improvement in texture and post-cooking nutritional quality.
Related Concept Videos
What is Monogastric Digestion?
Protein Digestion
Bioequivalence: Overview
Overview of Fatty Acid Metabolism
Fatty acids are catabolized in a process called beta-oxidation, which takes place in the matrix of the mitochondria and converts their fatty acid chains into two-carbon units of acetyl groups. The acetyl...

