Related Experiment Videos
Stylistic analysis of translated languages: A perturbation-based XAI deep learning framework
1School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangdong, China.
Plos One
|July 7, 2026
Summary
This study introduces an explainable AI (XAI) deep learning (DL) framework to interpret text classification models. The XAI DL framework effectively distinguishes translated from non-translated texts by uncovering subtle stylistic differences.
Area of Science:
- Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)
- Machine Learning (ML)
Background:
- Traditional machine learning and deep learning (DL) models are used for text classification in NLP.
- DL models excel at representation learning but often function as black boxes, hindering interpretability.
- Distinguishing translated from non-translated text reveals linguistic style differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and demonstrate an explainable AI (XAI) deep learning (DL) framework for text classification.
- To interpret the decisions of a DL model used to classify translated and non-translated texts.
- To uncover stylistic differences between translated and non-translated texts beyond superficial features.
Main Methods:
- A variational autoencoder (VAE) was trained using BERT embeddings from translated and non-translated texts.
- A stacked ensemble of three classifiers was used to classify the VAE's latent representations.
- A perturbation-based XAI method was implemented to interpret the DL model's classification decisions.
Main Results:
- The VAE-based model achieved accuracy scores above 0.8 in distinguishing between translated and non-translated texts.
- The XAI analysis successfully interpreted the DL model's decisions.
- Stylistic differences between the text types were identified, extending beyond lexical and syntactic features.
Conclusions:
- The developed XAI DL framework is effective for text classification and model interpretability.
- This framework can uncover nuanced stylistic differences in text data.
- The study demonstrates the potential of XAI DL for various NLP style analysis tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...