Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
Race/ethnicity and outcomes of venous ablation procedures
Pavel Kibrik1, Jenna Kwon2, Nikita Singh3
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endovenous ablation across racial and ethnic groups by comparing rates of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and recanalization.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 13,335 endothermal ablation procedures (radiofrequency or laser) performed from 2012 to 2022 at a single outpatient center. Patient demographics, including self-identified race/ethnicity (such as Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White), were recorded. Postprocedural duplex ultrasound study was conducted at 3 to 7 days, 3 to 6 months, and then every 6 to 12 months. EHIT (classes 1-4) and recanalization of the treated vein were identified on follow-up imaging. Outcomes were compared across racial/ethnic groups using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
Results:
Among 13,335 ablations (8187 radiofrequency and 5148 laser) in 3218 patients, 67.1% were performed in women. Mean follow-up was 25.8 ± 12.9 months (range, 3-72 months). EHIT incidence was highest in Black patients (3.0%), followed by Asian (2.6%), White (1.7%), and Hispanic (1.4%) patients; the difference between Black and White patients was significant (P < .001), whereas other pairwise comparisons were not. Procedural success (no EHIT or recanalization) was high and comparable across groups: 96.1% in Asians, 95.2% in Blacks, 96.1% in Hispanics, and 96.2% in Whites. On multivariable analysis, Black race was associated with higher EHIT risk (odds ratio, 1.92; P < .001), and Asian race with higher recanalization risk (odds ratio, 1.65; P = .045). Additional predictors of recanalization included advanced disease (Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysiologic class 6; P < .05), whereas the ablation of the great, anterior, or small saphenous veins was protective compared with perforator veins (all P < .001). Predictors of EHIT included older age (P < .0001) and previous recanalization (P < .0001), whereas laser ablation was associated with a significantly lower EHIT risk compared with radiofrequency (P < .0001). Baseline disease severity also varied: Black patients were more likely to present with advanced disease (Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysiologic class, 5-6) than Hispanic and Asian patients (P < .0001).
Conclusions:
Endovenous ablation is a safe and effective treatment for chronic venous insufficiency across different racial/ethnic groups, with overall success rates of 95% to 96%. However, racial differences were observed in complication rates and baseline severity: Black patients had higher EHIT risk and more advanced disease at presentation, whereas Asian patients had a slightly higher risk of recanalization. These findings highlight the need for tailored postablation surveillance and improved early access to care to address differences in minority populations.
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
