Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

03:42
A Simplified Protocol for Protecting Palatal Soft Tissue Donor Sites Using an Oral Mucoadhesive Bandage
Published on: February 17, 2026
Soft tissue grafting at immediate implants: does it protect the buccal plate?
Sunkanmi Olaore1,2, Pynadath George3, Kathryn Taylor3
1University of Lancashire, Preston, UK. Soolaore@lancashire.ac.uk.
Evidence-Based Dentistry
|July 7, 2026
Summary
Soft tissue augmentation did not significantly reduce buccal bone loss around immediate implants after six months. Volumetric bone loss was greatest in the coronal third, regardless of augmentation technique.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Periodontology
- Oral Surgery
Background:
- Immediate implant placement is a common procedure.
- Buccal bone preservation is crucial for aesthetic outcomes.
- Soft tissue augmentation is sometimes used to enhance results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of soft tissue augmentation on volumetric buccal bone changes at immediate implant sites.
- To compare subepithelial connective tissue grafting and acellular dermal matrix with no augmentation.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of CBCT and model data from a randomized controlled trial.
- Compared three groups: immediate implant with connective tissue graft, acellular dermal matrix, or no augmentation.
- Assessed 3D volumetric and 2D linear buccal bone changes at 6 months post-placement.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in volumetric buccal bone loss between the three groups at 6 months.
- Mean volumetric bone loss was -14.99 mm³ (connective tissue graft), -13.60 mm³ (acellular dermal matrix), and -12.58 mm³ (control).
- Greatest bone loss occurred in the coronal third; thick bone morphotype correlated with greater loss.
Conclusions:
- Soft tissue augmentation did not significantly reduce buccal bone dimensional loss at immediate implant sites.
- Linear measurements may not fully capture volumetric buccal bone changes.
